WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: BSOD "A clock interrupt was not recevied onasecondar

To: "Steve Prochniak" <sprochniak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: BSOD "A clock interrupt was not recevied onasecondary processor within the allocated time interval"
From: "Andrew Lyon" <andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 22:07:52 +0000
Cc: "Xen-Devel \(E-mail\)" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 14:08:31 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=t49t7cMD+vWXQlI67XPwi6W0vbMzxgg0fq9mpg3zQ4s=; b=YO572YUDZ3MiC8RZHJHibg6rJ9AY70E3vv0Gm0Qrtmrwd3fAVG9LhMDmD8aEq4aoRo mIjLlq/+syXuKmcxRFwqiBFYots9vdRkSXZOIuGRLoi4VJ6pvcObc2VfUDhAyLm3oREt 4aawXyCvME+tE2ZO6U3TxOwab103+efryEfSw=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=LFUipcWvnafuMJB3GIgBgpYYAaA8MAt/kwvqV3uT/Gc9ne/ywKNDFcgmtDGe2rU9f1 uM/sPbzNgEcAJqrIT1jhJeG/DzD7Djf5xfhMj8tb9ZEiJu4eIcBR6Lg/s8a3UJd329eH lg/XL6lAvKvgKWy91+F0T52UQklDOkZLoLtCc=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <B99564216C25704085A82B41C46DD3420883448E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <f4527be0812290132p2f29afe1k5dbad3888ee552ba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f4527be0901021033o64508d9fs91b4f063c845936b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <B99564216C25704085A82B41C46DD342088343FA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f4527be0901051224r6f5c9223me8c850f51ba65752@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <B99564216C25704085A82B41C46DD3420883448E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Steve Prochniak
<sprochniak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Andrew - you can run the "Novell Shim" which makes the hypervisor
> conform to the Microsoft spec enough that the guest OSs will turn off
> watchdog timeouts (0x101 BSoDs)...
>
> Steve

Happy to give it a try, where can I obtain it?

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Lyon [mailto:andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 3:24 PM
> To: Steve Prochniak; Xen-Devel (E-mail); xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: BSOD "A clock interrupt was not recevied
> onasecondary processor within the allocated time interval"
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Steve Prochniak
> <sprochniak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> All Microsoft 6.0 and beyond Operating Systems have a sense of
>> 'enlightment' which means they try to talk to the underlying
> hypervisor
>> - and if there is one, they do certain things like turn off 101
>> bugchecks.  The only real way to get Vista and beyond to work
> correctly
>> with SMP is to make Xen conform to Microsoft's hypervisor spec.
>
> I vaguely recall there being a way to make xen "lie" to the OS about
> the type of hypervisor, it might only be a feature on the commercial
> citrix xenserver?
>
> So basically there is no way to run Windows Vista or 2008 on Xen
> without risk of a 101 BSOD under load?
>
> If that is true then its a severe problem and Xen is useless for newer
> MS OS's :(
>
> Has anybody else had this problem and found a solution?
>
> Andy
>
>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andrew
> Lyon
>> Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 1:34 PM
>> To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Xen-Devel (E-mail)
>> Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: BSOD "A clock interrupt was not recevied
>> onasecondary processor within the allocated time interval"
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Andrew Lyon <andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> When dom0 is under heavy load any Vista or Windows 2008 HVM's that
> are
>>> running and have multiple cpu's assigned often  BSOD with code
>>> 0x00000101 "A clock interrupt was not recevied ona  secondary
>>> processor within the allocated time interval"
>>>
>>> It only happens if the load in dom0 is high enough to make the mouse
>>> pointer lagged, once the mouse fails to track in realtime the hvm's
>>> start to bsod within a few seconds.
>>>
>>> I have tried several versions of Xen including 3.2, 3.3 and 3.3.1
> rc4,
>>> and various kernels including the 2.6.18 xensource and 2.6.27-xen.hg.
>>>
>>> Here is a example config from one of my vista hvms, is there a
>>> timer/rtc setting that I need to add to avoid this problem?
>>>
>>> import os, re
>>> arch = os.uname()[4]
>>> if re.search('64', arch):
>>>    arch_libdir = 'lib64'
>>> else:
>>>    arch_libdir = 'lib'
>>> kernel = "/usr/lib/xen/boot/hvmloader"
>>> builder='hvm'
>>> memory = 2048
>>> name = "Vistax86"
>>> uuid = "b7bd2f2f-169f-4789-8aee-eaa77c543c99"
>>> vcpus=8
>>> vif = [ 'mac=00:16:3e:7d:bc:b1' ]
>>> disk = [ 'phy:/dev/vg_raptor/lv_vistax86,hda,w', ',hdc:cdrom,r' ]
>>> device_model = '/usr/' + arch_libdir + '/xen/bin/qemu-dm'
>>> boot="d"
>>> sdl=0
>>> vnc=1
>>> vnclisten="127.0.0.1"
>>> vncdisplay=11
>>> vncpasswd='vv8176a'
>>> stdvga=0
>>> serial='pty'
>>> usbdevice='tablet'
>>>
>>
> cpuid=['1:edx=xxx1xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,ebx=xxxxxxxx00010000xxxxx
>> xxxxxxxxxxx','4,0:eax=001111xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx']
>>> keymap='en-gb'
>>>
>>> Andy
>>>
>>
>> I think this is a known issue which has incorrectly been marked as
>> FIXED in bugzilla:
>>
>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1117
>>
>> there is a second bug report of the same problem, this time with more
>> details:
>>
>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1065
>>
>> Is there a fix?
>>
>> Andy
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>