[Xen-users] RE: Installing 3.2.0 rpm's compiled from srpm

To:	"xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	[Xen-users] RE: Installing 3.2.0 rpm's compiled from srpm
From:	"Joseph L. Casale" <JCasale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:06:09 -0600
Accept-language:	en-US
Acceptlanguage:	en-US
Delivery-date:	Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:06:50 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<49627735003F5C479100225C339F9FE0D35A47890A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<49627735003F5C479100225C339F9FE0D35A47890A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AckHv5MqgaFge/+IQ4yzrwPOyvuLxAAGJmfg
Thread-topic:	Installing 3.2.0 rpm's compiled from srpm

>Why does kernel-xen get pulled in and what's the significance of the vmlinuz 
>line when using the
>xen.gz-3.2 kernel provided by the 3.2.0 rpm? Is it not needed?

Answering my own question here...

Trolling the archives more prompted me to stumble onto one of Ross's posts
http://xen.markmail.org/message/3juxnjfdifmqizcb?q=3%2E3+spec+type:users
so as from what I gather I would still using the CentOS kernel (vmlinuz) with
the newer xen hypervisor from the hand rolled rpm's.

jlc


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-users

[Xen-users] RE: Installing 3.2.0 rpm's compiled from srpm