 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] ZEN Consolidation
| To: | Athena <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-users] ZEN Consolidation |
| From: | "Christopher Isip" <cmisip@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 27 Jul 2008 18:08:08 -0400 |
| Cc: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Sun, 27 Jul 2008 15:08:45 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=iKLpg/jbWDW7p8AE9ggaGHS1oR1YueMEe+Q0eUhe+6E=; b=aqgqtx8opF5gZ0b/QJBxsMRCRRPsRUkr9RJLNnRiRYGHYLZpY9wqGyuqPS2muysw4r OMFzCUdwKtSaJg/Y3jSsH4tgVH+yVfAwAQZB+to8E6lwmlVYY6CQJBnb6WiO6GsLySLM cOyyC8k9qTleZudtMZ8RwbpKlogrsZX2uHQpY= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=N+cxjtGSYtqQWaeDYqnatCL+no7mXAJ/PWSD2Kaf/FHQN7k1e1ifRTTejZuFLlAaHV n4KX9K3JHMZlgE9lSfU/kYWZvfARif/guMopPV3JqL80RsFwKuktoJi4klQJC1JA51f2 3MHTVhIHhXC78AmcUCMyI8a8Ze3EWHzyJmu38= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <97D4795939C64C7A9BE31186FD8686F8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <97D4795939C64C7A9BE31186FD8686F8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
Should be possible.
There will be two routers: The bridge firewall and the NAT gateway. My recommendation is to create a bridge without any physical interfaces connected to it, lets call it vif-bridge. Pciback the nic card that connects to the dsl router (say eth0) and pciback the nic card that connects to the private lan segment (say etn1). domU-bridge-firewall will have two legs, the pcibacked eth0, and the vif from vif-bridge. domU-http-server will have just the vif from vif-bridge domU-smtp-server will have just the vif from vif-bridge domU-nat-gateway will have the pcibacked eth1 and vif from vif-bridge. I am not sure how you would set the default route though with having two routers. I assume that you would need to set the hosts lan machines defautroute to the nat gateway and the nat gateways default route to the bridge firewall. The smtp and http domUs defaultroute might have to be set to the bridge firewall. Ofcourse, I could be completely wrong on this. Maybe somebody else could chime in. Chris _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] VT-d "partial" success - passing DVB-S tuner to Windows DomU (based off previous thread of similar name!), Daniel Kao |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-users] missing vmx cpuflag, Wang Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-users] ZEN Consolidation, Athena |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-users] Convert Trixbox HVM to PVM, Daniel Asplund |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
