WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Measure disk activity in full-virtualization.

To: deshantm@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Measure disk activity in full-virtualization.
From: "Alain Barthe" <ab266061@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:11:29 +0200
Cc: Alejandro Paredes <aleparedes@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 02:12:09 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=cuHwfH7krm1fK0SspkkSduvdrUdX369KFPh5yK32GJA=; b=KzZJ9Oijil5+f+LPJRcnTkm06Y4PAva6Fxzdsf0mTx7q2HizAx1Y0PFtSjrBsN2g87 2mcvVWkS8MFW1YxnqY55bAbTzdUfji3YUCp19fY+ECOTbd0YwqhXnpqTp/tluEXHvthZ 9TxR2h4hWK5QJGdy7PL9UaHDp7fAEtsB4mU+M=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=rp0LzQ0UAgMzqXKOh05g7yMtu+oMa36gr0on14uYgGQawWY3jNAdn+IrZ5Mkomx+2w wcRJbVqy5NHUYC8W9GA7IVSM6QoXuCLtX+DVl7tu9tZ5Gl3rBlw+AlR2otZXsTKrYyEd rYOFydYqCxAgwrTG5ELwg+l0J5Ijas6fcN8Ew=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1e16a9ed0807220813x698614axe790bb9399822440@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <c8c57fc50807181230lf19cd2dmfef3db9eb92c1881@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1e16a9ed0807191909u7b0cca5j98883564886013b2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <94e2f00b0807210221p503d474brea03b6c3df7841d4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1e16a9ed0807220813x698614axe790bb9399822440@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
2008/7/22 Todd Deshane <deshantm@xxxxxxxxx>:

When you say VMWare Server, are you referring to ESX?

I talked about the actual VMWare Server (http://www.vmware.com/products/server/), which should be closed from VMWare Workstation.
 


We used VMWare workstation in that paper, ESX is a different animal altogether.
 

With Xen, no such a behaviour, isolation looks like much better. That why we migrated all our servers from VMWare to Xen.

Perhaps benchmarks don't always reflect the real world...

The workload matters a lot. The version of the software and hardware configurations can matter a lot too.

Sure, but concerning CPU isolation, I can't understand, theorically, that full virtualisation is better than para virtualisation. And our experiment confirms this. Can you explain this point ?

Thanks.
 


Cheers,
Todd
 
--
Todd Deshane
http://todddeshane.net
check out our book: http://runningxen.com

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users