WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

RE: [Xen-users] The death of XEN by Novell

To: "'Stefan de Konink'" <skinkie@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-users] The death of XEN by Novell
From: "Venefax" <venefax@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 22:29:55 -0400
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 19:30:53 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:references :in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; bh=zNvmhXaFH1TtcSyE019JSkbydGEjZrekACfXQVg9BBY=; b=pI44EcwpwsGmo0EAQPLaTZ9kezWQiRvqQ01E8qhQqM/j1FmEh+uTsv0HWBsFsU/uRf ImJq+aeYAfoG8PePvbkTSQmqlI4LY9GA0weEh2C4y+ObQG0Ao1NLGVowFF7U5SASY1SS U2dKr4h6+2v1s+QQt4ZqCvjOkQj7eMhLjglg4=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer :thread-index:content-language; b=PMkcgjCTy5ZPz2+E3mxVJ8m5K9AX8TIHmG66lw7B7zna4+lz6VY9c1qBn03kEeOQPJ InuVeThWBHzfiPRfK6HEO/E3dudAKEN+jCFMEIX+nKprdGY2OsiXam+aDdwccAEMlLO3 3qc9SUWQn/XE3hNH0kh1eQrcZTGCpmPthEZxY=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4882A1B1.1040704@xxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4882028E.87A6.0099.1@xxxxxxxxx> <op.uekbfcay50772i@discordia> <48827926.7030004@xxxxxxxxx> (sfid-20080719_193334_900407_0591F096) <200807191937.27633.jim_burn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <043101c8ea05$e08b49e0$a1a1dda0$@com> <4882982B.7090707@xxxxxxxxx> <043801c8ea0a$c4627ae0$4d2770a0$@com> <48829C75.2060708@xxxxxxxxx> <044801c8ea0d$d23fa540$76beefc0$@com> <4882A1B1.1040704@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcjqD7TfVeL12NwERxeDit3kSuV3TwAAFJeA
I cannot use 1 VCPU per windows domain. I have SQL Server running literally 
hundreds of transactions per second. I use Windows only to hold, to contain SQL 
Server, and since 100% of the transactions come from Linux domu's, the speed 
and performance is fantastic, for there is no trip over the network. Each of my 
windows domains has 32 GB of RAM and 8 VCPU's. Without SMP I am as good as 
dead. In fact, I am buying a dew Dell box on Monday only for SQL Server.


-----Original Message-----
From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stefan de Konink
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 10:24 PM
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] The death of XEN by Novell

Venefax schreef:
> I am already using one processor on dom0 and only 4 GB of ram, out of
> my 127. 

I think you don't really get it yourself. My target would be to get the 
amount of memory on Dom0 as low as 32MB, that seems to be pretty 
impossible currently (python), but I am sure I'll get there. But did you 
do what we told you? Set the amount of vcpus to 1 per Windows domain?

Please report back if you did.


> But Novell, when asked, said officially that it would not
> make much difference.

I'm happy you trust you Novell informants :) You might need to read some 
academic papers that were written about Xen. Might need to ditch Novell 
and take a different attitude to the developers of the software you are 
technically using for free. (And getting free support from!)


> I open a ticket and asked the question. The
> helped me but dismissed all claims that it works. Go figure.

I have asked this individual now two times to not troll on a 
mailinglist. And reply off list, since this individual who doesn't even 
want to give a name... but google enlightens us by the name of Philip

Philip, you are making a complete fool out of yourself. It is good that 
Google keeps a track record. You seem to be a happy Asterisk user too :)


Stefan

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users