WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] transparant (secure) bridge

To: "Markus Hochholdinger" <Markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] transparant (secure) bridge
From: "Michael Kershaw" <mike.kershaw@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:56:08 -0400
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:56:42 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=40VvdhX/80Y/Yf5CJXMziJF42AbQNLek1cwRB78+uQQ=; b=JcxBoz64lsdkVlRfYl9UrP++zX2goKQwXpDHHJR1l0B3QhsTjIcCJTxQWylVy3Ra6T ewh2WMfOkVRtUIc1BPbMTfRo2C80SJo16oltJj36RD6rdI6TyePWJXtudpNYT+XzV1PD Gl4tDgVwFt3WF8R0EMhPEVo+uKdMDOKpLbs7M=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=XUxWNVWp/GEpolx/LM6yY+0HzTCGLc06aHZ2QH/wcFkGowughUcxtll8McF9eXfzqx zLZk41YBz/MrfGBsKIgMl4OoO1AAU+CCMq2ARgE0M0ra8A72AekZYGscZkd2lR99cMEg YsZQfmzhds68QRa/gLUfQjqqX337zhOIBsjUo=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200804082142.57753.Markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <dad39cd60804080850l57e1fe3cj73a1fdbf0344830c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200804082142.57753.Markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
What you've described here, is what I'm working on right now.  I've
setup my dom0 with two nics bonded as bond0.  I'm going to be running
say 3 or 4 vm's on this host that will each have their own static
ip's.  I just haven't figured out how to make it all work as far as
the vm's networking is concerned.  Do you recall the steps that you
performed to make your setup work?

Thanks,
Mike

On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Markus Hochholdinger
<Markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag, 8. April 2008 17:50 schrieb Jeroen Kleijer:
> [..]
>> Would such a implementation be feasible or does the dom0 network
>> interface always have to have an IP stack for the bridging to work?
>
> a bridge is layer 2, ip is layer 3. So there's no problem using a bridge
> without ip.
>
> I've a setup where dom0 has two nics bonded, and bond0 is part of the bridge
> for the domUs. And neither has an ip in dom0, only the vif in the domUs have
> ips.
>
>
> --
> greetings
>
> eMHa
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>