| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
Re: Xen 3.2 HVM help (was Re: [Xen-users] intel or amd?)
On Sunday 02 March 2008 09:59:34 am Matthew Haas wrote:
> I would if I were on the machine in question. As it is, it is at a
> remote location and I'm accessing it over a VPN... so unless I'm missing
> something (ie can I even use the SDL way if I'm NOT on the local
> machine's console??) I can't go this route.
If you are doing ssh with X forwarding (ssh -X hostname) over the VPN, either
vnc or sdl will work fine.
> > vif = [ 'type=ioemu, mac=xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx, bridge=xenbr0' ]
>
> Is it essential to add the "bridge=xenbr0" ?
>
> Will networking not work in an HVM without it?
>
> And.. with all the recent talk about bridging and Xen 3.2, I get the
> impression xenbr0 isn't used in the same capacity anymore... in which
> case, should I say "bridge=eth0" ? Or, is that referring to something
> else entirely?
Do a 'brctl show' on the dom0. Whatever bridge peth0 is attached to would be
the one you use in the bridge= parm, or just let it default.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home