 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
Re: [Xen-devel] Fwd: [Xen-users] Missing 3.2 binary install package
| To: | jim burns <jim_burn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] Fwd: [Xen-users] Missing 3.2 binary install package |
| From: | Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 01 Mar 2008 11:17:18 +0000 |
| Cc: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Sat, 01 Mar 2008 03:12:46 -0800 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7vLwHYmfyP420zGUcHENJq9Bn3TV4I3OJCQBCsQfoEE=; b=eLUZN5MEW+wyA0eEXgb9taUMH61rfiWaUUzxC3Ht99IXo3Lz0sXOEeHuTJ58UX5ECOnMdjhWb6/Jqv0RjHTpmcE8wVpW/OiYCSXku9qCuAz+fJkRDQpJAKHxFcrMHuRgQ9e3PDmQrHNRg0E7qpylMKN7lTliQau6Z/yAcn1WwQE= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tuLE0MyvagAd3Y9smv+o1IYrOKlycw7lJtOF4Usx1f4+UjL9us9T6uBpcAYpZZe9c0OhFLz1uODlaXk7pMAyW89pkn8JkvHWq/DTQBSKVWngLH5g1PWz6TjTF990qLfOIgpcS9WnWaK1PoGX9fmHhBYdWsOdln0yPixs/EtFJDI= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200802282032.42676.jim_burn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <47C14825.4090406@xxxxxxxxxx> <1e16a9ed0802271903h37d11b8bl69bea3dd13dffcaf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <18374.52137.419852.538053@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (sfid-20080228_102536_877178_2262AAF1) <200802282032.42676.jim_burn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) |
jim burns wrote: It should, it has for work I've done before. The DomU kernels are much more forward compatible with more recent Dom0 kernels than the reverse: it's not really suprising.On Thursday 28 February 2008 09:56:41 am Ian Jackson wrote:Failing that, I would suggest building the hypervisor or the kernel (whichever you don't have) from the source tarballs on the xen.org website. Vendors' dom0 kernels intended for 3.1 are generally useable with 3.2.What are the limits here? Would the xen.gz 3.0.3 compiled with the dom0 kernel, such as found with Centos, work with the xen 3.2 tarball? I would assume the compatibility code would let it work, but what features would be unsupported/not functional? Thanx. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] Xen on 32bit machine with 8GB of RAM, Nico Kadel-Garcia |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] Can I install domU without virt-manager?, Nico Kadel-Garcia |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] Xen on 32bit machine with 8GB of RAM, Nico Kadel-Garcia |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] intel or amd?, Nico Kadel-Garcia |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
