[Xen-users] [RFI]Is NAT broken with Linux HVM guests?

To:	xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	[Xen-users] [RFI]Is NAT broken with Linux HVM guests?
From:	"pradeep singh rautela" <rautelap@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 23 Feb 2008 12:10:32 +0530
Delivery-date:	Fri, 22 Feb 2008 22:41:07 -0800
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=2d3PPkNCPp7Sd8LNZEAwfJMRYoAHgZacweg0Td5kCPM=; b=fr1n/7dsRbUfBX2RD78gxlqaYyFzGF7tmqQIbWeHbXBSaPZq92USo8xBulRiWdb2rBsRzQ41cUsIixJooQXJypE/FruxyHhBUQ5SiIVStLjCaWkliPjV/Ic2L+V/+ydKhoFJ8jL0zmGn6YyGXKKjw+fjDADo31likeDbr1W3ocQ=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=l60WFlMEIYV9rnagDwjcZm6GBFKrMpOMW/cK1nXJTE8desMReQpREohfv02g/x54lx5SwxZuJYku79q2tutRwwGFOAVqnAYjwTO5+j9bY0amfXtEIquTjK+Dhv1DcIa4VI/q12NXImk4eKwqL5bVD3pkhRZZARpU1EVx2gf2aTk=
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi All,

I tried a usual NAT setup with a Linux HVM guest.
Looks straight forward approach.

Unfortunately I cannot ping even domain0's eth0 interface.

Xen assigns an IP address for me to vif1.0, where 1 is the domid of my
HVM guest i.e 10.0.1.128(changes are per vmid and domid).

I manually attached ip address 10.0.1.2 to eth0 in HVM domainU and add
default gateway to be 10.0.1.128.

Now if i try to reach 10.0.1.128, it is unreachable.why?

eth0 has an IP address 10.100.207.11.

Even attaching an ip alias eth0:0 10.0.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 does not helps.

Shouldn't vif1.0 be atleast reachable from HVM domain with NAT?

Any help, corrections or pointers are welcome.

Thanks,
   --Pradeep


-- 
Pradeep Singh Rautela
http://eagain.wordpress.com
http://emptydomain.googlepages.com

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Previous by Date:	Re: [Xen-users] trouble starting from nfsroot, Todd Deshane
Next by Date:	[Xen-users] xen & lvm, fatiha fallahi
Previous by Thread:	[Xen-users] network-multinet usage?, Tom Horsley
Next by Thread:	[Xen-users] xen & lvm, fatiha fallahi
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-users

[Xen-users] [RFI]Is NAT broken with Linux HVM guests?