WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Xen Disk I/O performance vs native performance

> obviously it's the same filesystem type, since it's the same
> 'partition'.  of course, different mount flags could in theory affect
> measurements.

Sorry, I must've missed something earlier.  I didn't realize you were
mounting and writing to the same filesystem in both cases.  But this is
interesting -- if you're mounting a filesystem on an LV in dom0 and then
passing it as a physical device to domU, how does domU see it?  Does it
then put an LV inside this partition?

> > Please use bonnie++ at a minimum for i/o benchmarking.  dd is not a
> > benchmarking tool.
> 
> besides, no matter what tool you use to measure, use datasets at the
> very least three or four times the largest memory size.

Exactly.  bonnie++ (for example) provides the -r argument, which causes
it to deal with i/o at twice your memory size to avoid cache benefits.  

John


-- 
John Madden
Sr. UNIX Systems Engineer
Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana
jmadden@xxxxxxxxxxx


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>