WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] RHEL5 Xen failover cluster - iSCSI with HP AiO400 for cl

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] RHEL5 Xen failover cluster - iSCSI with HP AiO400 for cluster file system
From: Giulio Fidente <gfidente@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:24:27 +0000
Delivery-date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:25:13 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <14989393.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <14989393.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022)
gnujon wrote:
Hi,

[...]

I was just wondering if anyone has had any experience with a setup at all
similar to this, and whether anyone thinks it sounds like a feasible Xen
failover cluster solution?

in theory it's not (or should not be) something strictly related to Xen (the use you're going to have of your cluster) I've managed anyway more than one cluster built with RHEL (4) and GFS ... generally for mail purposes

we were using optical fibers and not ethernet to reach the storage, but it went good

gfs requires attention and a good tuning, the locker we were using were suffering some little problems when the delay in completing the operation was too high but there were already the fixes on the redhat's repository and anyway it was the old GFS not the version 2

I would be careful anyway in having a mixed environment (w2k3/rhel) for a so specific task, especially in a so critical point of the system (the storage)
--
Giulio Fidente
"What we have done for ourselves alone dies with us;
 what we have done for others and the world remains."

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>