WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Xen and networking.

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Xen and networking.
From: Mark Williamson <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 17:15:51 +0000
Cc: tmac <tmacmd@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 09:16:26 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <73699aa30712281228j694f9fb5l17860901fad8cd77@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <73699aa30712281228j694f9fb5l17860901fad8cd77@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405)
Most people seem to be assuming you are running PV guests.  Are we correct in 
thinking this i the case?

Cheers,
Mark

On Friday 28 December 2007, tmac wrote:
> I have a beefy machine
> (Intel dual-quad core, 16GB memory 2 x GigE)
>
> I have loaded RHEL5.1-xen on the hardware and have created two logical
> systems: 4 cpus, 7.5 GB memory 1 x Gige
>
> Following RHEL guidelines, I have it set up so that eth0->xenbr0 and
> eth1->xenbr1
> Each of the two RHEL5.1 guests uses one of the interfaces and this is
> verified at the
> switch by seeing the unique MAC addresses.
>
> If I do a crude test from one guest over nfs,
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/nfs/test bs=32768 count=32768
>
> This yields almost always 95-100MB/sec
>
> When I run two simultaneously, I cannot seem to get above 25MB/sec from
> each. It starts off with a large burst like each can do 100MB/sec, but then
> in a couple
> of seconds, tapers off to the 15-40MB/sec until the dd finishes.
>
> Things I have tried (installed on the host and the guests)
>
>  net.core.rmem_max = 16777216
>  net.core.wmem_max = 16777216
>  net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4096 87380 16777216
>  net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 4096 65536 16777216
>
>  net.ipv4.tcp_no_metrics_save = 1
>  net.ipv4.tcp_moderate_rcvbuf = 1
>  # recommended to increase this for 1000 BT or higher
>  net.core.netdev_max_backlog = 2500
>  sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_congestion_control=cubic
>
> Any ideas?



-- 
Dave: Just a question. What use is a unicyle with no seat?  And no pedals!
Mark: To answer a question with a question: What use is a skateboard?
Dave: Skateboards have wheels.
Mark: My wheel has a wheel!

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>