|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] CentOS 5.1 and Xen - mount: could not find filesystem '/
Erich Weiler wrote:
Hi all-
I'm hoping someone can help me with this problem with Xen under CentOS
5.1 (RHEL 5.1) I'm having... This is the Xen package that comes stock
with the distribution, I didn't compile it from source. I can boot
Domain0 and the hypervisor just fine. I'm trying to bring up a Xen
guest VM and it crashes on boot, with this error:
# xm create -c tcga1 vmid=1
...
Creating root device.
Mounting root filesystem.
mount: could not find filesystem '/dev/root'
Setting up other filesystems.
Setting up new root fs
setuproot: moving /dev failed: No such file or directory
no fstab.sys, mounting internal defaults
setuproot: error mounting /proc: No such file or directory
setuproot: error mounting /sys: No such file or directory
Switching to new root and running init.
unmounting old /dev
unmounting old /proc
unmounting old /sys
switchroot: mount failed: No such file or directory
Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
I can't for the life of me figure this out... Here is my domain config
file info:
kernel = "/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-53.1.4.el5xen"
ramdisk = "/boot/initrd-2.6.18-53.1.4.el5xen.img"
memory = 4096
name = "tcga1"
cpus = "" # leave to Xen to pick
vcpus = 2
vif = [ '' ]
disk = [ 'phy:tcga1vg/tcga1root,sda1,w' ]
disk = [ 'phy:tcga1vg/tcga1data,sda2,w' ]
disk = [ 'phy:tcga1vg/tcga1swap,sda3,w' ]
root = "/dev/sda1 ro"
extra = "selinux=0 3"
I tried making a custom initrd file with --preload=xennet
--preload=xenblk and that didn't seem to help...
Did you change sdax in disk = section to xvdax? Did you change root = to
from /dev/sda1 ro to /dev/xvda1?
Did you change the /etc/fstab of the guest accordingly?
Also I'm using LVM for my disk devices but I don't think that should
make a difference?
I have the guest domain VM configured in fstab to reference sda1, sda2
and sda3 as noted in the above config... Does anyone have guidance for
me?
Also, one other question... Given my above config, is this VM running
in para-virtualized mode or full-virtualized mode? I think it's para
but hard to know for sure...
It's para.
--Sadique
Thanks much in advance!
-some_guy
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
|
|