 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
[Xen-users] paravirt_ops DomU, does it mean performance?
| To: | "Xen users mailing list" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-users] paravirt_ops DomU, does it mean performance? |
| From: | "Emre Erenoglu" <erenoglu@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:31:01 +0100 |
| Delivery-date: | Tue, 11 Dec 2007 07:31:32 -0800 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=9a5U5dhKJXkykikPNnpgJXRQ+K8ZdhlHvzZYGt41pWs=; b=DfBy/CXbUbodzOzz05rPKndaav1ZX1xe1CczOm/qJBfIL0YbqBpDWIhJRRTh4DAMkvQ7pwxDFKk3nRl2vCQovnr7gzGbveJSn5Mz9v8zumeAGBeiAAn3UG0py4kk/Ojy+gOE/atGTMdud+8oTm6uGB6o67CTuOueByQ+UaqMgCQ= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Hg7iYL7daSeuJmtRjM5IWpXnuLFJhqhGizvKFfHuVfDilXmfJ86w4dhc8eh8vj2OMIXnM5OhEhzbtrysc4fbkOkU4mbeFsLTlb5QOJGOswvPnn9fqTiJVmRXW4PdStp9NADRT+oDJh79qyEJpAPQlfiZbLnqLy4G2ZcAHnLguvs= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
Hi, I was wondering if using a paravirt_ops enabled kernel (say 2.6.23) as a Paravirtual DomU would mean higher performance out of the box, or if we still need to compile some xen specific device drivers for network and block devices. Similarly, if HVM domains can run at the same performance as PV domains just by using PV drivers for network and block, why are we bothering ourselves with PV? Why don't we -always- use HVM DomU's with PV drivers? Thanks for views on this, Br, Emre Erenoglu erenoglu@xxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] DomU with 2.6.23.9, Power-Netz (M. Schmidt) |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] Where does xen chache domUs grub.conf ?, John Madden |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-users] Xen 3.1.0 build question., TMC |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] paravirt_ops DomU, does it mean performance?, Mark Williamson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
