|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Recommended partitioning for xen host
Hi again,
I think a lot depends only sure way to know is test it. I use Xen with
very low end hardware (PIII's 512MB ram each) i use no raid and in some
cases everything but the root is all on one ide device. It works fine
for what i do which is very light weight work loads really. But sure if
you need the disk IO performance using more than one disk or raid is
very useful. iSCSI seems to be of interest in larger scale deployments.
Geoff.
john maclean wrote:
What about using a number of disks, one for dom0 and others for the
domUs? They would all be "fighting" I/O on the same disk, right?
disk one - dom0 with partitioning as suggested as above.
disk two - lvm for domUs.
On 26/11/2007, Geoff Kirk <geoff.k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
There shouldn't be anything special about partitioning for Xen just
plenty of space for the guests you want to run. What you have planned
sounds sensible enough. Usualy the main consideration is can the box
handle all the work of all guests it will be running. Swap might be a
little excessive for dom0. I usualy go with same amount of ram as i
allocate to dom0 using dom0_mem as i would with any physical system.
5gig for root is more than plenty to run xen.
Geoff.
Josh wrote:
Is there a recommended partitioning for dom0?
Here's what I have planned.
/swap 2GB
/boot 100MB (ext3)
/ 5GB (ext3)
xenmachines LVM volume group for the remaining diskspace
dom0 will install in 5GB / and each domU will have a swap and root
logical volume in "xenmachines"
Thank you,
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
|
|