WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] [SECURITY] preventing Hwaddr spoofing on bridge

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] [SECURITY] preventing Hwaddr spoofing on bridge
From: Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 07:50:23 +0000
Delivery-date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 23:51:12 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4748D580.2000406@xxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Openpgp: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
References: <474642D6.9060905@xxxxxxxxx> <20071124151225.GA18701@xxxxxxx> <4748D04E.9090802@xxxxxxxxx> <20071125014825.GA3347@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4748D580.2000406@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Hi Stefan,

On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 02:53:04AM +0100, Stefan de Konink wrote:
> Hi Andy,
> 
> Andy Smith schreef:
> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 02:30:54AM +0100, Stefan de Konink wrote:
> >> It is *not* the IP addy that borks. It is a duplicate mac address in the
> >> bridge. So I 'virtually' take over a MAC address belonging to someone
> >> else on the bridge. Binding an IP address to a MAC address is too simple.
> > 
> > I hard code all MAC addresses in the domain config file and when I
> > last tested any attempt to change the vif's MAC address after that
> > results in no connectivity.  Is it still possible?
> 
> Just do a xm console host2, then your host2 will be connected...
> (basically simulates a 'script' running)

I see your point.  I hadn't thought of that problem before.  I have
done some preliminary testing with ebtables and the following seems
to work:

ebtables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i some-vif -s ! aa:00:00:6a:38:0c --log-level 
debug --log-prefix 'SPOOF:' -j DROP

In this example I have a domU on some-vif with MAC address
aa:00:00:6a:38:0c.  I then log into console and issue:

# ifdown eth0
# ifconfig eth0 hw ether 00:16:4e:14:ae:10
# ifup eth0

00:16:4e:14:ae:10 is a MAC address of another domU on the same
bridge.

I then see in dom0's syslog:

Nov 25 07:28:03 kwak kernel: SPOOF: IN=some-vif OUT= MAC source = 
00:16:4e:14:ae:10 MAC dest = 33:33:00:00:00:16 proto = 0x86dd
Nov 25 07:28:04 kwak kernel: SPOOF: IN=some-vif OUT= MAC source = 
00:16:4e:14:ae:10 MAC dest = 33:33:ff:14:ae:10 proto = 0x86dd

I receive no kernel message in domU about duplicate MAC addresses,
as I have previously when attempting this.  The bridge does not see
the MAC address shift from one port to another.  Connectivity to the
victim domU does not die as it had previously.

So, I think this may be what is required.  I will keep the rule in
place for my test domains for a while just to check that it doesn't
get triggered incorrectly.

Can you still find a way to break it after using this method?

Cheers,
Andy

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users