|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] PV on Centos 5 64-bit
Jens-Petter Salvesen wrote:
Nico wrote:
Jens-Petter Salvesen wrote:
Hi,
I'm having a very difficult time getting paravirtualized Xen running
on Centos 5 64bit and I'm hoping someone can spot what I'm doing
wrong.
I've been attemping to do this for a few days now and I'm really not
seeing what I'm doing wrong.
Here's what I've done:
1. Installed Centos 5 64-bit on the Dom0
2. Installed a fully
virtualized DomU running Centos 5 64-bit.
3. Created a new configuration file that will create a
paravirtualized >
DomU
Why aren't you using virt-install? Did you want to duplicate the
virtual system entirely?
I would prefer to be able to select upon boot-time if the VM is going to
run as fully virtualized or paravirtualized. That would enable me to
evaluate both solutions. I thought that it was possible to just make two
different config files that boot two different kernels for the same VM?
To my understanding, a fully virtualized VM must _not_ run a xen-enabled
kernel while a paravirtualized VM _requires_ a compatible xen-enabled
kernel. Is this correct?
Oh, no. A fully virtualized VM can certainly run a Xen enabled kernel
(barring some oddnesses with particular kernels). But the initrd
certainly needs the right drivers to do so. I think you'll find that a
fully virtual VM needs different device drivers than a para-virtualized one.
Also, if you're using pygrub, you don't have to state a kernel. I don't
know if it breaks things, but it's confusing at best.
I know. That kernel= statement is just a leftover from debugging.
Got it. One thing I've done when doing a restoration from a system
image, to get the grub set up, is to delete the kernel from the guest
domain and do a virt-install "upgrade" on top of it.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
|
|