[Xen-users] sles10sp1 bonding - bridging or routing

To:	xen-users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	[Xen-users] sles10sp1 bonding - bridging or routing
From:	"Remigiusz Stachura" <remigiusz.stachura@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 4 Oct 2007 22:08:40 +0200
Delivery-date:	Fri, 05 Oct 2007 09:59:44 -0700
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=7+Vtk64ZKAbTIklefZD25UKuCqWkIt+zXfqj13Ha7so=; b=E+1Dnq04oTDJkTkOqrgA/kSHrtD/18cVgDalkXWFUdKankuS7kwDuVRuvE8XYnv7vv2FBH9B11unkdQ+C6u4VpeZvcqFxEEvnX0svS5jn/bX65yxorWXZrqNlPSts8is70Y/03sfOQdygxmheTI+Wv2rVCBIY1FM5pcILcB+YMo=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=bgcUqu1+oNGciz5cRwyPHDJlFCpBnovehJBrNZJ0SzkNUDR25KusOpT4MuxnFg/uOKD9SolQFrtQjPsNSZLILxlEV8wOK9A2NUgl5pHoqqbt8FsQF34fY2PL7cNff4tJyZAy8dPsHOySQD1gV1Q0VPnuBU2kaCcEB8kqV4TtGfw=
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi,
I tried to use Xen 3.0.4+ with the bond0 device in active-backup mode
(eth0+eth1) on SLES10SP1 using standard Xen network scripts
(network-bridge, vif-bridge). After rebooting server I got interfaces:
bond0, xenbr0, vif0.0,peth0,...;
bond0 and xenbr0 - both of them had the same IP address and MAC
address!!!. Is it normal situation? (if there is no bonding I got
eth0, xenbr0, vif0.0 ...  and only the eth0 has IP address.)

What schould I choose for bonding: use of bridging scipts or routing scripts?
(In my configuration Dom0 and DomUs have IP addresses from the same
network segment).

When I tried to use Xen routing script for bonded eth0+eth1interfaces
I got any vif0 or peth0 interface. Schould I modify that script or add
there bond0 as a parameter?

Thanks,
Remy

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-users

[Xen-users] sles10sp1 bonding - bridging or routing