This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


[Xen-users]Some questions about PCI-passthrough for HVM(Non-IOMMU)

To: Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-users]Some questions about PCI-passthrough for HVM(Non-IOMMU)
From: "陈诚" <concretechen@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 01:07:13 +0800
Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 10:03:47 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=fn1+N34HU6/2+RC1ftBcnidkgrz0FQP8mO8VJ7IU7sg=; b=f3p+4SRn2/IhqIPQMS0S+RZv4MzOLhRnnMfekxNDpVATnIE1fAK2AfpVZY8atICo97bt4tqG5dhQMnUUAKV3l8aDhp6uOjZ4CSkirWI7sdeT8SUDGgQlpHrb6W7vM2R0MHcc+5ccdzEPKiJWIN7bDwo2eQJEls57npvY5xpHNBo=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=GFpeikUh7TZj88FW6/OnoAJbEiO/iWTfd5J67E2ffDLrNUVi+o65LoE5Mqw7190x9kx7MkX2cocQKIhyT8kyodu7FyoucnalWY4vjxczcWomxXuR7hZ5RL/Ls0vAgforxoraBzRvrjepJXFV3xm7KupGPavOcfsg5nuly53KG1Y=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


         I saw some patches about PCI-passthrough for HVM(non-IOMMU) and I am interested in it. I want to assign my graphics card(nVidia GeForce 7900GS) to an HVM domain (Vista) in order to run 3D-intensive work(for example, 3D-games).

         What I want to ask is that is it really possible to pass the graphics card to HVM domain running Vista now? That is, have anyone ever successfully passed a modern graphics card to a Vista HVM? Since the graphics card is a kind of complicated device. Are there any technical problems with the passthrough of a modern graphics card?

         I have tried the direct-io.hg subtree, but I just can't boot the Vista HVM domain with nativedom=1 option. Xen boots without any problem with nativedom=1, nativedom_mem=1024M option(here the 1024M memory is reserved for the HVM) and dom0_mem=800M option(I have 2G RAM totally). But when I type xm cr vista.hvm to create the HVM domain(note that it is bootable without the nativedom=1 option), sometimes a disk read error occurs(as displayed on the HVM screen), sometimes it just appear to be dead locked and sometimes it says: "Error: Device 768(vbd) could not be connected". After the failure of starting the HVM as nativedom, I can't even start it as a normal HVM domain, the symptom will also be dead lock or "Error: Device 768(vbd) could not be connected". If a disk read error occurs during the boot of the HVM domain, the host's filesystem will appear to be inconsistent.

         So there is surely some problems with the nativedom(Neo-1to1) part in the current diret-io.hg subtree. The author has memtioned that on x86-32, the memory 0-12M is mapped to 16-28M, and if any devices DMA at 0-12M, crashes may occur. Is it possible that the dead-lock problem and the "Device 768(vbd) could not be connected" problem during booting are caused by the mapping?

         This is just the one part of the problem. Another problem is that currently I don't have the driver of my graphics card(nVidia GeForce 7900GS), using lspci command I saw it is the pci device 06: 00.0, but there is no "driver" directory in /sys/bus/pci/device/06:00.0/, when I use the PCI=['06:00.0'] option in the hvm config file, error message says can't find /sys/bus/pci/device/06:00.0/driver. Is it still possible to use pciback to hide this device and pass it to the HVM domain? I typed "modprobe pciback" to insert the pciback module, but I still can't find any pciback directory in /sys/bus and any of its sub-dir. Should I need to compile it directly into the kernel?

         And finally I want to ask another question, can I assign two usb devices to two different HVM domains now? If not, any future support about this issue?

         I am not familiar with the code of the HVM part. I will take a look at this part and the nativedom patches, but first I want to make sure I am on the right way.

         Thank you.
Xen-users mailing list
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Xen-users]Some questions about PCI-passthrough for HVM(Non-IOMMU), 陈诚 <=