WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

[Xen-users] Why no xen-vncfb in Xen's 3.1 binary tarball?

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-users] Why no xen-vncfb in Xen's 3.1 binary tarball?
From: "Marconi Rivello" <marconirivello@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 08:17:47 -0300
Delivery-date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 08:21:50 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi there,

It took me a while to find out that there were no xen-vncfb included in the binary x86_64 (don't know about the other architectures) tarball, and that it was causing xm create to fail (obviously, when the domU had vfb defined).

Is there a reason for this? Or they just forgot?

Thanks,
Marconi.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Xen-users] Why no xen-vncfb in Xen's 3.1 binary tarball?, Marconi Rivello <=