 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
[Xen-users] Why no xen-vncfb in Xen's 3.1 binary tarball?
| To: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-users] Why no xen-vncfb in Xen's 3.1 binary tarball? |
| From: | "Marconi Rivello" <marconirivello@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 4 Sep 2007 08:17:47 -0300 |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 05 Sep 2007 08:21:50 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
Hi there, It took me a while to find out that there were no xen-vncfb included in the binary x86_64 (don't know about the other architectures) tarball, and that it was causing xm create to fail (obviously, when the domU had vfb defined). Is there a reason for this? Or they just forgot? Thanks, Marconi. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-users] capture xen & dom0 serial output in HP ILO's virtual serial port, Tijl Van den Broeck |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] PV domain on NAS, trilok nuwal |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-users] capture xen & dom0 serial output in HP ILO's virtual serial port, Tijl Van den Broeck |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] PV domain on NAS, trilok nuwal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
