WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Is NPTL in PV Xen Possible in RHEL5/CentOS 5 Distros?

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Is NPTL in PV Xen Possible in RHEL5/CentOS 5 Distros?
From: Mark Williamson <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 03:37:18 +0100
Cc: George Lenzer <George.Lenzer@xxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:37:42 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <46D2E805.6050200@xxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <46D2E805.6050200@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.9.6
> I'm in a bit of a bind.  My organization is planning to move to a new
> mail system and I really want this box to be up as close to 24x7 as
> possible.  I am currently working on an HVM domain running RHEL on top
> of CentOS.  What I'm concerned about is the issue of I/O (disk and
> network) since a mail system will be very busy in that way.  The mail
> app I'm planning on running needs NPTL.  When I tried a paravirtualized
> Fedora Core a few years back, the installer for that app said it
> wouldn't install since the kernel didn't have NPTL.  So this led me to
> believe that I had to wait for HVM.

You're right that HVM ought to work for you.

> Now, I'm not so sure...  In my 
> recent searches, I've seen that all that's really required is a glibc
> that supports NPTL and that if one runs Xen this way, you wind up with
> slow performance.  I suspect this has something to do with the TLS lib
> that many Xen docs say to rename?

In the olden days, if you didn't rename the TLS lib (to disable it) then Xen 
would have to do a whole load of emulation.  Ought to be correct, but would 
cause some slowdown.

RHEL5 and CentOS 5 ship a glibc setup which is Xen aware and will do the Right 
Thing when used on a Xenified kernel.  It should Just Work for you.

>
> So has anyone made a glibc that will install on RHEL or CentOS that is
> Xen friendly at this point?  If so, I may be in much better shape than I
> thought.

RHEL and CentOS ship with Xen.  The glibc they ship ought to work (at least, 
it ought to work with their kernels, and I assume it'll work with others) 
with good performance and without you having to make any manual configuration 
changes.

Cheers,
Mark

-- 
Dave: Just a question. What use is a unicyle with no seat?  And no pedals!
Mark: To answer a question with a question: What use is a skateboard?
Dave: Skateboards have wheels.
Mark: My wheel has a wheel!

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>