 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] xen 3.1 and 32bit guests in 64bit dom0
| To: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-users] xen 3.1 and 32bit guests in 64bit dom0 |
| From: | Lorin <lorins@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:07:59 +0300 |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:05:49 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=SHvUzqFEqmO4VYvd107qJ5tsJ8D+DxUak7URHr/ENP0F8YAnWz2weJtqI3SmhpnYFrMh9cK5StoyY7pInwsI7DATT4QEMNei67RQGrjitA1MSfd5En5cIFcSaHRpt46yQ/WL4/waIEhQy+yesPjpsR8ht36jOQTy2sSGk5rtZjM= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qqMFEo5I3AWzeS3QtKmL//nPLw5BSOxesch1tPMyRxW1IjLyf9Q8VbKwFdGUUtO6cOl7XSs9aU5f9JmqknM+ArH3nenys6bANWPOqYTLWCVRsmDgPFWQyTuXOeffT2ygTwSKhwGg+2bwvMkSpclA3p7Z1Na269Z2+YiKrCRST1I= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <46A855DA.2060307@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <727629700707251325m5c38ad2q2474f08fd89914c2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46A855DA.2060307@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On 7/26/07, Martin Goldstone <m.j.goldstone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > 1st question: Is the domU kernel actually a Xen kernel? By the look of > that error, I'd guess that it isn't, especially as normally Xen kernels > have -xen in them somewhere, and yours ends in -smp. You need to have a > Xen kernel to do PV, or you have to use HVM. It's not a Xen kernel but a plain old stock kernel on which I'm supposed to run the VM (application requirements ). I have VT support in the cores so HVM should be enabled from what I've read so far . Does it require anything else ? Speaking of PV and HVM the latter is better because it makes use of hardware support right ? > 3rd question: If Danilo Godec's suggestion about the NIC driver doesn't > work, could you give us some more details about your networking setup > (ie NIC make/model, Bonding, VLANs etc)? Yeah, it was the bnx2 problem. Thanks a lot! -- + Lorin + Nosce te ciment. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] xen 3.1 and 32bit guests in 64bit dom0, Lorin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] xen 3.1 and 32bit guests in 64bit dom0, Martin Goldstone |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] xen 3.1 and 32bit guests in 64bit dom0, Martin Goldstone |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] xen 3.1 and 32bit guests in 64bit dom0, Martin Goldstone |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
