|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
RE: [Xen-users] Uname shows 64bits rather than 32 : yum problem. 32 bits
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pascal
> Sent: 18 June 2007 12:57
> To: Goswin von Brederlow; xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Uname shows 64bits rather than 32 :
> yum problem. 32 bits on dom0 64 bits is it possible ?
>
> Thanks!
>
> well....
>
> some tell that with xen 3.0.3 it is impossible to install 32
> bits guests on 64 bits dom0 !
It depends on the type of guest. If you have a para-virtual kernel, then the
kernel and the hypervisor must match exactly (and since Dom0 is a kernel on top
of the hypervisor, it must be 64-bit when the hypervisor is 64-bit).
HVM (fully-virtual) guests can be "anything smaller than or equal to the
hypervisor", so on a 64-bit hypervisor, you can run any type of kernel up to
64-bit.
> They said that it is possible only with xen 3.1 !
Correct in as much as 3.1 adds the ability to run a 32-bit PAE para-virtual
kernel on Xen 64-bit hypervisor (and that includes that you could have Dom0
32-bit if you want, and I think you can even use 32-bit Dom0 and 64-bit DomU if
you should want that).
>
> Others tell it is !
Well, others may be wrong, depending on which of the above definitions they
mean are able to run on 3.0.3 - I'm a Xen Developer, and I've seen the patches
for the "32-on-64" go into 3.1. There's quite a lot of work added to support
this, and it would have been noticable if it went into 3.0.3 instead of 3.1.
As to using "linux32 yum" to install a para-virtual guest, it probably will end
up with something that doesn't run (unless you also have Xen 3.1 at least).
--
Mats
>
> Pascal
>
> Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
>
> "Petersson, Mats" <Mats.Petersson@xxxxxxx>
> <mailto:Mats.Petersson@xxxxxxx> writes:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pascal
> Sent: 17 June 2007 17:43
> To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Xen-users] Uname shows 64bits
> rather than 32 : yum
> problem. 32 bits on dom0 64 bits is it
> possible ?
> ...
> I ask this becasue I have installed a
> 32bits guets but when I
> do a uname -a on the guest i have this :
> Linux fqdn.domain.com
> 2.6.18-8.1.6.el5xen #1 SMP Thu Jun 14
> 18:01:24 EDT 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> it looks like it shows exactly the same
> info than the dom0
>
>
>
> It shows what it is supposed to show: The kernel you
> are running.
>
>
>
> It is a problem because yum, on the
> guest, looks for 64bits
> packages rather than 386 ones
>
>
>
> That would be a pretty stupid bug in yum then. I see
> nothing wrong
> with running a 64bit kernel with 32bit userspace (as
> you do). That is
> perfectly supported in Debian.
>
>
>
> Si it normal ?
> How to tell to yum to look for i386 ?
>
>
>
> If yum really is so stupid that is uses uname then run "linux32
> yum".
>
> MfG
> Goswin
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
|
|