WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Xen + RHEL5 + 64/32 bit

To: Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Xen + RHEL5 + 64/32 bit
From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 12:22:59 +0100
Cc: Arie Goldfeld <arik.goldfeld@xxxxxxxxx>, Mark Williamson <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Steven Timm <timm@xxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 04:21:30 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <46690CB0.4040207@xxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706061549460.7175@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <817d8cc30706062248u38179af7u2b7bf8ca0f9058b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200706080202.20444.mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <46690CB0.4040207@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 09:00:48AM +0100, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Mark Williamson wrote:
> >>>Does anyone have experience with the Xen that's built in to RHEL5?
> >>>Does it have most of the feature set of the open source version xen 3.04
> >>>or is it an older version?  Has it proved to be stable?
> >>>      
> >
> >It's based on Xen 3.0.3.  Amongst other things this means that its HVM 
> >support is not quite so advanced (the specific thing that comes to mind is 
> >SMP HVM guest support is not quite there, but I'm sure there are other 
> >fixes to HVM and other code too in 3.0.4).
> >
> >I believe the RHEL 5.1 update is slated to include a newer Xen, possibly 
> >3.1.
> >  
> I don't see how it could be 3.. Fedora Core 7 is only up to 3.0.4. And 
> at the Xen presentation by RedHat I visited last month, they were very 
> clear that stability and consistency of software is a big, big, big deal 
> in the RHEL world., and I don't think they've had enough time to really 
> test the released 3.1 code.

Fedora 7  (no Core in the name anymore) is using 3.1.0  for hypervisor
and userspace. The Fedora 7 kernel is temporarily on 3.0.4 until we finish
the kernel rebase to 3.1.0 + 2.6.21

As you say, RHEL is all about stability so upgrading software versions,
particularly if end user facing commands / tools change, is not really
an option. 


Dan.
-- 
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston.  +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=-           Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/              -=|
|=-               Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/               -=|
|=-  GnuPG: 7D3B9505   F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505  -=| 

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users