|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] overhead of Xen when using iSCSI
Siim Vahtre wrote:
I have setup iSCSI targets (with open-iscsi) to dom0 (Xen 3.1), which
are exported to paravirtualized guests:
disk = [ 'phy:/dev/iscsi/test0,hda1,w' ]
Everything works fine, but there is huge overhead. If I write to iSCSI
device in dom0 I get write speeds of about 29Mbytes/s, but if I write
to /dev/hda1 in domU I only get about 14Mbytes/s.
This kind of performance drop does not happen with regular disks or
even NBD - they have some overhead but not 50% like I have with iSCSI.
I have searched the list and I know that some people have successfully
run setup similar to mine, so I'd like to ask if anyone could please
share their experience and tell me if 50% performance drop is really
normal.
Thanks!
The performance hit happens for me with local disk on Dom0 and with
dedicated partitions for DomU use, and it's even worse with file images
on Dom0. I haven't made or had the chance to use iscsi yet, since I only
recently laid my hands on a GigE switch for my setup.
How did you test this? And do you have good guidelines on setting up
iscsi? I'm finding fairly useless directions all over the place, but no
good guides for RedHat/CentOS setups.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
|
|