| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
RE: [Xen-users] Windows 2003 x64 under Debian amd64 - hangs on "Setupis
AMD has tested windows 2003 SP1/SP2 64b HVM guests with xen 3.1 without
any issues on AMD-V, uniproc and SMP HALs. Also, 1, 2, 3, 4 VCPUs, and
using pae/acpi/apic=1 in guest config file.
SLES10SP1 is based on 3.0.4 and that also passed testing, but there were
some backported patches that might help with APIC/ACPI.
So, there could be some issues with base 3.0.4 and windows 64b HVM
guests, I'll look at the older test logs and see if there were any known
issues, including with apci/apic settings for install.
Bottom line is if you use 3.1 you should be fine with win2003 64bit on
AMD-v.
tom
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> James Harper
> Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2007 8:53 PM
> To: James Harper; xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Windows 2003 x64 under Debian amd64
> - hangs on "Setupis Starting Windows"
>
> I'm now installing the 32 bit version of windows and it is
> well past the point where the 64 bit version hung.
>
> Is there anything I need to specify to Xen that it should be
> using a 64 bit hvm? Or are all hvm's created equal and just
> depend on the underlying hardware?
>
> Thanks
>
> James
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-users-
> > bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of James Harper
> > Sent: Friday, 18 May 2007 21:40
> > To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [Xen-users] Windows 2003 x64 under Debian amd64 - hangs on
> > "Setupis Starting Windows"
> >
> > I'm just testing xen-3.0.4 on an amd64 machine (HP ML115),
> and trying
> an
> > install of windows 2003 x64. So far it just hangs at "Starting
> Windows",
> > which I assume is when the windows installation bootloader
> has loaded
> > enough drivers and is starting the windows kernel.
> >
> > I've seen several other posts with the same problem, but
> most of them
> > appear to be resolved by hitting F5 and selecting "Standard
> PC". When
> I
> > hit F5 I only get a choice of multiprocessor or uniprocessor.
> >
> > Can anyone tell me if this is a known problem with xen-3.0.4 and my
> > configuration, or if they have such a configuration and have it
> working,
> > or if they have a more recent version of xen and have it working?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > James
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-users mailing list
> > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home