> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jordi Segues [mailto:jordisd.mailing@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 15 May 2007 10:38
> To: Petersson, Mats
> Cc: bdubas@xxxxxxxxxxx; xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] SMP support in Windows domU
>
> Hello again,
>
> I've spoke too fast, sorry :)
> After some tests, I finally have a Windows XP HVM guest
> running with 2 vcpus.
>
> I set it in the config file, and then installed windows with
> that config file.
> After the final reboot, windows says he have upgraded some features
> and that he needs a reboot to apply them.
> After the reboot, it detects new "hardware" with the little icon at
> the right with the "acpi" label.
> Then, doing a CTRL-ALT-SUP, I see 2 CPUs in the task
> manager/Performance.
> That's all :)
>
> I've tested with a 1 vcpu install too, upgrading it to 2 vcpu then in
> the config file, and I seems not to work, for the moment.
This should work, but you may have to upgrade the HAL configuration in device
manager, as the single-processor HAL doesn't support even detecting the second
processor.
--
Mats
>
> Sorry again.
>
> Cordialy,
>
> Jordi.S
>
> On 5/15/07, Jordi Segues <jordisd.mailing@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've followed your conversation...
> > I'm trying too to run a windows hvm guest with several vcpus.
> >
> > I've Xen 3.0.4 installed and recompiled on a Debian Etch, and all
> > works great, unless the SMP support in HVM windows guests.
> >
> > In my config file I have:
> > ....
> > vcpus=2
> > acpi=1
> > apic=1
> > ...
> >
> > But my HVM guest still don't detect 2 vcpus.
> > I've tried it after the windows install, and then I've reinstalled
> > windows with this config file, but nothing changes (thought windows
> > detects it at install time).
> >
> > I've read a post in this mailing list (don't have the link) where
> > someone says that the hvmloader firmware must be recomplied
> > specifically. And I've understanded too that the recompilation is
> > static, so all the vcpus number of all hvm guests will have to be
> > identical.
> >
> > I haven't tried to do this, but I thought that xen 3.0.4
> offered this feature.
> > So like Bart, I would like to know if anyone have done it! :)
> > Anyone have an HVM windows guest running with 2 vcpus? and
> if yes, how?
> >
> > Well, maybe the 3.1 release (3.0.5) will fix this, and maybe not,
> > cause everyone says "it should", but I can't find someone
> really doing
> > it. :)
> >
> > Thank you very much!
> > And I would like to thanks Mats too, who's allways here,
> and answers a
> > lot of questions very clearly.
> >
> > Cordialy,
> >
> > Jordi.S
> >
> > On 5/14/07, Petersson, Mats <Mats.Petersson@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> > > > bdubas@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Sent: 14 May 2007 10:48
> > > > To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Subject: RE: [Xen-users] SMP support in Windows domU
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I want to install drivers for Windows as you describe...
> > > >
> > > > > The right solution is to install a Para-virtual driver, but
> > > > for Windows,
> > > > > you can't just build one yourself (unless you are
> > > > experienced in Windows
> > > > > driver design), so you need one that matches your Xen
> > > > version (easiest
> > > > way
> > > > > to achieve that is to install a package with Xen and the PV
> > > > driver, such
> > > >
> > > > > as XenExpress). The para-virtual driver will install as a
> > > > device driver
> > > > in > Windows, but instead of talking to a virtualized "true"
> > > > > network device, it just packs up the data to go on the
> > > > network and sends
> > > > > it directly to the Dom0 network backend driver.
> > >
> > > I haven't myself done this. I think you need to remove
> the "ioemu" from the network device.
> > >
> > > And you may have to have two disks (one to boot from that
> uses the "ioemu" model, and one that you use for
> applications/data that uses the PV driver).
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mats
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > ASEC S.A.
> > > > Bartłomiej Dubas
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Petersson,
> > > > Mats
> > > > Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 11:36 AM
> > > > To: Bartlomiej Dubas; xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Subject: RE: [Xen-users] SMP support in Windows domU
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> > > > > bdubas@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > Sent: 14 May 2007 10:34
> > > > > To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > Subject: RE: [Xen-users] SMP support in Windows domU
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks Mats,
> > > > >
> > > > > What kind of entry I should have in quest config. Should I
> > > > left it the
> > > > > same as is or pas them without qemu option?
> > > >
> > > > What is it you want to achieve. Your config looks pretty much
> > > > like the one
> > > > I'm using.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Mats
> > > > >
> > > > > My carnet config looks like this:
> > > > > disk = [ 'phy:/dev/raid-0/serpiko,ioemu:hda,w' ]
> > > > > memory = 512
> > > > > vcpus = 2
> > > > > cpus = "4-5"
> > > > > builder = 'hvm'
> > > > > device_model = '/usr/lib/xen/bin/qemu-dm'
> > > > > kernel = '/usr/lib/xen/boot/hvmloader'
> > > > > name = 'win2003'
> > > > > vif = [ 'type=ioemu,bridge=xenbr0' ]
> > > > > stdvga = 0
> > > > > sdl = 0
> > > > > vnc = 1
> > > > > vncviewer = 0
> > > > > ne2000 = 0
> > > > > localtime = 0
> > > > > on_poweroff = 'destroy'
> > > > > on_reboot = 'restart'
> > > > > on_crash = 'restart'
> > > > > boot = 'c'
> > > > > acpi = 1
> > > > > apic = 1
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > ASEC S.A.
> > > > > Bartłomiej Dubas
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Xen-users mailing list
> > > > > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Xen-users mailing list
> > > > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Xen-users mailing list
> > > > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Xen-users mailing list
> > > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> > >
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|