WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

[Xen-users] (network-script network-nat)

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-users] (network-script network-nat)
From: "Franck" <franck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:31:19 +0100 (CET)
Delivery-date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 03:30:27 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Importance: Normal
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: franck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4
Hi,

one little question

In xend-config.sxp, i've this :
(network-script network-nat)
(vif-script vif-nat)

In my domU config file, i've this
vif = [ 'ip=192.168.0.61' ]
ip="192.168.0.61"
netmask="255.255.255.0"
gateway="192.168.0.1"

I'm starting domU and ALL work fine YAHOO.
BUT, because there's a BUT, in dom0, ifconfig like this :
vif1.0    Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF
          inet addr:192.168.0.188  Bcast:0.0.0.0  Mask:255.255.255.255
          inet6 addr: fe80::fcff:ffff:feff:ffff/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:4 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
          RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)

What's this IP 192.168.0.188 ???
Is it possible having 192.168.0.61 instead ???

Franck
-- 
http://www.linuxpourtous.com


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>