| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] a new server for Xen
But with paravirtualised Linux, with a recompiled kernel, you have
better performance.
Petersson, Mats a écrit :
-----Original Message-----
From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jan Albrecht
Sent: 01 March 2007 05:16
To: xin
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] a new server for Xen
xin wrote:
Thanks for that. What about a VT-supported cpu to do the
para-virtualization
instead of full-virtualization? which one is better.
I've AMD PV and Intel VT here and from my point of view the VT are much
better (and that's no matter if they're AMD, Intel or from Mars...),
because you can install an OS "out-of-box" to that server.
With PV you're limited to Linux and to special kernels. And the
arguments Mats brought up may be right, but as long as you do normal
daily business on such a server (file-server, webserver, etc...) at VT
machine would always be the better choice.
Sure, with VT (in my view obviously preferrably from AMD ;-) ) you have
ALL the possibilites, rather than just half of them. I should have said
so in my post.
--
Mats
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
--
Yves-Gaël Chény
Responsable développements techniques
Responsable Achats techniques
Responsable RH technique
261 route de Clisson 44230 St Sébastien sur Loire
Tel : 02 40 97 62 67 - 08 73 77 24 91
http://www.tranquilitsystems.com/
yves-gael.cheny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tranquil IT Systems . SAS 37 000 ¤
yves-gael.cheny.vcf
Description: Vcard
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home