 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] No eth0 in domU...
| To: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-users] No eth0 in domU... |
| From: | "Jerry Amundson" <jamundso@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 24 Feb 2007 13:10:14 -0600 |
| Delivery-date: | Sat, 24 Feb 2007 11:09:40 -0800 |
| Dkim-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=JniqwAX7Yp8VwrZ9HlxqQV4gMxSDDp/V9al5svbkpOR8AK6PVssiC2TTGGaizEOMHoujeYuXLvlgcHo/0hjVQMNNQZhZVHS5Uo+4Dqj9b3u0eMLGQWpy4kbWj+yQ5wfPzwSoYeB+Y48k1aRkGaDR+fswB7VZ5XYXTchXlVKIX2E= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=L2/dWf7IAWeLk+9BTqAuIs/rOntXFoR4PGTOLPAZJ0qUfc3DbwJ/OfeE5seZ5WEcbwdnNSpYFo3JLsV5RMYZSjZ5+BcU+J1HJjifDM4wxo/5OkKV87XW9d5KnJRjLgaerftQk3p0s1SN1mJzwAltvThmvEUL4btA+jDTK8Ysyyo= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <09D59AEF0405D740BDCA2FAC0E0EA97601B3D2A5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <09D59AEF0405D740BDCA2FAC0E0EA97601B3D2A4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6d06ce20702241054q341358afl4c27d5e60fb4834@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <09D59AEF0405D740BDCA2FAC0E0EA97601B3D2A5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On 2/24/07, Kraska, Joe A (US SSA) <joe.kraska@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Ran across this problem recently. Below attached worked for me on a > > reboot. Still gathering "low level linux administration expertise" > > here. Would one alternative to the modprobe.conf be to recompile the > > domU kernel such that it needs no such modprobe entry? > Yes, but why? Having it there keeps the install "more normal"... Fair response. OTOH, it's not normal for me to have to make manual modprobe.conf entries when installing a redhat OS. Will contemplate the implications overall. Thank you. Agreed. And that's a packaging problem. The rpm should have udev awareness added to it so the "usual" device magic is done, even though the device is virtual... jerry -- "Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!" _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Xen-users] No eth0 in domU..., Kraska, Joe A \(US SSA\) |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-users] /lib/modules..., Kraska, Joe A \(US SSA\) |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [Xen-users] No eth0 in domU..., Kraska, Joe A \(US SSA\) |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] No eth0 in domU..., Javier Guerra |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
