Re: [Xen-users] Xen opinions?

["Guido Barosio" <gbarosio@xxxxxxxxx>]

Gary,

  Are this webservers serving static content (apache) or are they
running any sort of application (tomcat/jboss) ?

  Can you describe your servers configuration, just to get a picture?
We are getting some initial benchmarks, but I would apreciate external
input on this one.

 Thanks in advance,
Guido Barosio

On 2/9/07, Gary W. Smith <gary@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hello Xen group. I'm new to the list but so far I have had excellent
> > response to my questions. Thank you! May I pose one general question
> to
> > the group? I am evaluating Xen Para Virtualization for use at our
> site.
> > How do you feel about it's: reliability, usability, utility? Is it a
> > quality piece of software? Would you recommend it? Is it mature enough
> > for a production environment? Does it perform well?
> >
> Tony,
>
> We have been using paravirtualized guests for some time under rPath and
> they work great.  I have had mixed results with different guests under
> FC6 but using a different Dom0 I have had pretty good success.
>
> My only suggestion is that if you have a distro combo that is working
> well for you, stick with it for THAT version of Xen that you are using.
>
>
> Overall, it performs fairly well.  We use tap:aio (file) based images
> and we get a little performance hit with but overall we are getting
> better allocation of CPU time that if we didn't have virtualization.  We
> have two instances on (on two separate boxes) that act as web servers
> that serve ~1.5M web hits per day (each).  They seem to do just fine.
>
> Gary
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
--
Guido Barosio
-----------------------
http://www.globant.com
guido.barosio@xxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users