WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Changing gears with wallclocks

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Changing gears with wallclocks
From: "Ulrich Windl" <ulrich.windl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 08:54:11 +0100
Delivery-date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 23:54:32 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1170225535.10154.81.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Universitaet Regensburg, Klinikum
Priority: normal
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 31 Jan 2007 at 14:38, Tim Post wrote:

> Good day to all, 
> 
> Does anyone know if altering the clock type (turning on independent
> clocks via the proc/ setting) goes into effect immediately, or is a
> re-start of the guests needed before this setting takes effect?

>From my experience, the effect of changing a sysctl value (which that is), 
>takes 
immediate effect until reboot (i.e. the value is not remembered). That should 
answer your question. Also, you can read back the value at any time.

> 
> I would just experiment and see, but my guests are in production and I'd
> like to avoid an intentional time warp just to see if the settings stay
> independent, all of them are busy time stamping various things.
> 
> I need to setup a ntp server on just one of the guests that runs just a
> few seconds behind real time, but leave the rest of the guests on real
> time honing into a 'true' ntp server. Am I being over-optimistic
> thinking I can do this without stop/starting the guests?

The above said, it seem natural that a restart of the NTP services makes sense 
after having changed the kernel clock algorithm.

Regards,
Ulrich


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>