xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

[Xen-users] Problem at the 4G barrier.

from [Jacques Normand]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	[Xen-users] Problem at the 4G barrier.
From:	Jacques Normand <jnormand@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 22 Dec 2006 11:03:08 -0600
Delivery-date:	Fri, 22 Dec 2006 09:03:22 -0800
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to:	xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mutt/1.5.9i

Hi eveybody,

I am still fighting with the problem I mentionned earlier about the TLS.
I exchanged some hardware to be able to run the debian kernel (and
remove one more failure point). I still see the same problem, that is a
segfault in /lib/libnsl.so.1 in the domU but I learned a bit more.

If I for the dom0 to be given less memory (dom0_mem parameter), then it
works. I know that the debian kernel is not PAE and since I have 4G of
ram on my dual athlon, I should need a pae kernel to get all the
available memory. Nevertheless, it should not segfault, just give me
less memory addressable.

did I miss something?

jacques

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-users] Problem at the 4G barrier., Jacques Normand <= Re: [Xen-users] Problem at the 4G barrier., Christopher G. Stach II Re: [Xen-users] Problem at the 4G barrier., Jacques Normand

Previous by Date:	Re: [Xen-users] XEN 3.0.3 on Ubuntu 6.10: Dom0 reboot, PUCCETTI Armand
Next by Date:	Re: [Xen-users] New to xen, difficulty getting network going, Henning Sprang
Previous by Thread:	[Xen-users] xen dom0 kernel in redhat4.4 with qla2xxx firmware, Roland Touchais
Next by Thread:	Re: [Xen-users] Problem at the 4G barrier., Christopher G. Stach II
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]