 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] limitation of 3 virtual network interfaces
| To: | "Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-users] limitation of 3 virtual network interfaces |
| From: | Christian Hergert <christian.hergert@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 10 Nov 2006 01:19:25 -0800 |
| Cc: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Fri, 10 Nov 2006 01:19:50 -0800 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=imvCaAGu74SrtIC2BcSPTBeOJKD6RValHpnurNJlp/rDIbYitpDmRD+iBS85QQrfr3KrbyuGl+OR6UlJMDC9QqEvViS1ofaZdf1vZCgjbuDzZlYxQTMdCILUkp+bjnmEacwZI0RtJybI40E1Zw16C0KeoRvAREEoM+yVoMDvP0A= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <45543403.6050100@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <907625E08839C4409CE5768403633E0B018E15F5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45542F67.60700@xxxxxxxxx> <45543403.6050100@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060918) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Doing the vlans in the domU instead of in bridges in the dom0 seems to work. Thanks Fajar. - -- Christian Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > Christian Hergert wrote: >> Can this be worked around? My virtual routers need upwards of 15-20 >> vif's and I was hoping to upgrade them this weekend. Looks like ill be >> going back down to 3.0.2 for now. > I believe you can use VLANs. I tested the 3.0.3 64 bit binary tarball > briefly and it seems to support VLANs on domU out-of-the box. > > Regards, > > Fajar > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFVEQcJ8Qu7UaHlggRAucVAKDMK83FnCR3LZrIQjt2AE3hCmiywACg1zfZ k47RaZSKg9SohQWn1qoXQq0= =XZBK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] IntelVT wiki page, Michael Paesold |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-users] information for shadow paging in xen for vt., aditya shevalkar |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] limitation of 3 virtual network interfaces, Fajar A. Nugraha |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-users] information for shadow paging in xen for vt., aditya shevalkar |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
