Re[4]: [Xen-users] No internet in the second DomU

[Sergey Bondari <bondari@xxxxxxx>]

Dear Jerry,

Monday, November 6, 2006, 6:28:42 PM, you wrote:

JA> On 11/6/06, Sergey Bondari <bondari@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Dear Jerry,
>>
>> Monday, November 6, 2006, 4:55:04 PM, you wrote:
>>
>> Nothing special. Looks very similar to the 1st DomU.
>>
>> 1st DomU
>> ---------
>> eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:16:3E:4B:E6:F5
>>           inet addr:81.0.213.11  Bcast:81.0.213.15  Mask:255.255.255.248
>>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>>           RX packets:125733 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>           TX packets:936 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>>           RX bytes:8385112 (7.9 MiB)  TX bytes:73825 (72.0 KiB)
>>
>> lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
>>           inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
>>           UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
>>           RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>           TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>>           RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
>>
>>
>> Kernel IP routing table
>> Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags   MSS Window  irtt 
>> Iface
>> 81.0.213.8      0.0.0.0         255.255.255.248 U         0 0          0 eth0

JA> Wouldn't valid host addresses for that net be 9-14?

I was setting this network according to my ISP reccommendations. Even
if you are right it does not explain why dom0 and dom1 are ok and
other domUs aren't


-- 
Best regards,
 Sergey


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users