WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

RE: [Xen-users] Ipcop...

To: <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Ipcop...
From: "Alex" <magobin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 08:26:57 +0200
Delivery-date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 23:29:13 -0700
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:in-reply-to:x-mimeole:thread-index:message-id; b=GC4j6G9L31P7RHXMGkI1wl+cgsWogZ1JrUqkNneiQy+L/TJ1lqdnJ8ejooNapB1hDdhHNpQb/fKP4CQytWzUscTGA3LhEQwz0cpVS1Z1P+mYR/b8eDaEMjPHOM7WwFKRKO1SWK0TamhJTSaWDtJzYbBEkWl/bn3puVYUBil9yTQ=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200610022209.41252.lists@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcbmqwQlheU9oROXT+6XmosUmhjFrwABWCPQ
> I may stand to be corrected here, I do not believe IPCop will 
> run "paravirtualized" under Xen 3.  I seem to recall that it 
> has something to do with Xen 3 not being able to compile a 
> 2.4 kernel properly and/or a Xen 3 2.6 kernel host not being 
> able to run a 2.4 kernel, even if it is patched with the Xen hooks.
> 
> It is/was possible under Xen 2.
> 
> If you are running on a VT-enabled Intel or AMD chip, I 
> believe it would be possible to run IPCop unmodified.
> 
> I don't have a VT-enabled chip, so I am running  my domains 
> "paravirtualized", but I would love to be running IPCop as my 
> firewall.  Guess I may have to wait until I either get a 
> VT-enabled chip or IPCop releases their next major release, 
> which is supposed to run a 2.6 kernel :-)
> 


Unfortunately my pc for this test seems doesn't have VT support (amd sempron
3000+)
So...at this moment it seems that I don't have any chance to setup Ipcop on
xen 3
This is a problem because even if ipcop releases a 2.6 version...we have to
wait that many addons support that release..

:-(

Alex


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>