| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
RE: [Xen-users] Which do you recommend AMD or Intel for HVM?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Robert Hulme
> Sent: 28 September 2006 11:02
> To: Xen-users
> Subject: [Xen-users] Which do you recommend AMD or Intel for HVM?
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> We're looking at getting a / some boxen in to run Windows server in
> Xen. I was wondering what thoughts / experience you guys have had with
> that?
>
> We're also wondering if we should get the Intel or AMD chips with VT?
> The Intel chips seem at first glance to be cheaper and better
> performing than the AMD chips so it looks a bit like a no-brainer, but
> I am aware that the memory bandwidth on the Intel chips is much worse.
> Are there any benchmarks / anecdotal experiences of using either with
> Xen HVM?
They are pretty equal implementations at the technological level. Memory
bandwidth will have more of an effect in a virtual machine than it does
in the regular system, as you get more memory accesses to do with the
switching between hypervisor and guest and page-table management in the
guest/hypervisor, compared to the bare-metal system. [How well this is
cached depends very much on the amount of work done between HV/guest
switches]
Unfortunately, I can't point you to any direct benchmarks or such...
>
> We're not overly concerned with the cooling / power draw aspect.
>
> The big question for us though is the level of support for the VT in
> AMD chips in Xen. I know that it hasn't been around as long, is the
> HVM implementation for Intel on Xen production ready?
I strongly disagree with this statement - the HVM architecture was put
in place for the purpose of supporting the AMD-V architecture with the
same infrastructure that Intel put in. Xen has several AMD-V boxes
provided by AMD for testing, and whilst there may be bugs in any code, I
don't agree that the AMD-V support is immature - it's been in Xen
officially since the 3.0.1 release - which is 0.0.1 release later than
the Intel VT support was introduced officially.
--
Mats
>
> Thanks a lot everyone.
> -Rob
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------
> "I am a strong advocate for free thought on all subjects, yet it
> appears to me (whether rightly or wrongly) that direct arguments
> against christianity & theism produce hardly any effect on the public;
> & freedom of thought is best promoted by the gradual illumination of
> men's minds, which follow[s] from the advance of science. It has,
> therefore, been always my object to avoid writing on religion, & I
> have confined myself to science." - Darwin
>
> http://www.robhulme.com/
> http://robhu.livejournal.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home