|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
RE: [Xen-users] HVM systems review
Anymore detailed information? Also are there any options on BIOS to enable vt?
Thanks
Yunhong Jiang
>-----Original Message-----
>From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
>Derek Sherlock
>Sent: 2006年9月11日 8:18
>To: xen ml
>Subject: Re: [Xen-users] HVM systems review
>
>Hi,
>
>I've been struggling to get VT working on my new HP d4600y.
>Up till this point I assumed the problem was that I was doing
>something wrong. But your email makes me wonder whether I
>just have an incompatible chipset. Windows'
>MyComputer/Hardware/Device Manager listing shows:
>
> Intel(R) P965/G965 Processor to I/O Controller - 29A0
>
>Does that mean that I should give up on VT? (If so, I feel
>rather cheated -- I bought the computer specifically for use
>with VT under XEN, and if it doesn't work, I've wasted a whole
>lot of money!)
>
>In general, how do you KNOW if your system is VT-capable? If
>it doesn't seem to work, how do you know it's the chipset
>causing the problem? And how will I make a better informed
>choice, if I have to buy a different system to replace this
>expensive paperweight!
>
>Thanks,
>Derek.
>
>On 9/10/06, Nicholas Lee <emptysands@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I've done a short study on the current VT options:
>http://stateless.geek.nz/2006/09/11/current-virtualisation-hardware/
>
> I've got a few issues I'm still trying to determine.
>
> It seems that only the Intel Core Duo 2 desktop chipset
>that supports VT is the Q965/963.
>
> Has anyone seen support for VT on any of the other 965
>chipsets?
> Do any of the non-Intel chipsets (nForce 500?) support VT?
>
>
> Conversely it seems that all AM2 (desktop) socket
>systems support Pacifica.
>
> How good is the AMD Athlon 64 X2 CPU is at supporting HVM?
> What about the AM2 motherboards. Is there generic out
>of the box HVM support for all motherboards? Are some AM2
>motherboards better?
>
>
> PS:
>http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/HVM_Compatible_Processors
>should be updated with the new Opteron's
><http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30_1
>18_8796_14309,00.html> .
> However it seems the Xeon 5100s are 15% faster than the
>Opteron 2000s.
>
>
> Nicholas
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
><mailto:Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
|
|