WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

RE: soft lockup was (Re: [Xen-users] Kernel error)

To: <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: soft lockup was (Re: [Xen-users] Kernel error)
From: "Roger Lucas" <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 14:47:01 +0100
Delivery-date: Sun, 03 Sep 2006 06:49:59 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20060802222216.GB17411@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Aca2gljkdjaQ5026RmmoycpiT/cp2QY3FdJw
I have suddenly got these same errors occurring on my Xen-3.0.2-2 system.  I
have four DomUs with 256MB ram each and 512MB on the Dom0 running on an
Intel Celeron system.

Is the only solution to upgrade to Unstable, or is there a patch/upgrade
available for the 3.0.2-2 release?

Thanks, Roger.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-users-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve Traugott
> Sent: 02 August 2006 23:22
> To: Jones, Chris
> Cc: rbp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: soft lockup was (Re: [Xen-users] Kernel error)
> 
> Hi Chris,
> 
> Did you ever reach any sort of conclusion about the current state of
> the soft lockup bug?  Do you have a stable build now?  What changeset
> is it?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Steve
> 
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 07:37:33AM -0500, Jones, Chris wrote:
> > I am getting the same errors in the stable 3.0.2 but I am not getting
> > the errors on unstable so it looks like you are right. I am downloading
> > the testing tree in an attempt to test it there. I will holler when I
> > find something out.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rodrigo Borges Pereira [mailto:rbp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 7:23 AM
> > To: Jones, Chris; xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Kernel error
> >
> > I believe that thread states that the fix is already in 3.0.2. And i am
> > running 3.0.2.
> > Did i get it wrong?
> >
> > tks
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jones, Chris [mailto:chris.jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: sexta-feira, 7 de Julho de 2006 13:18
> > > To: rbp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Kernel error
> > >
> > > There is a fix for this issue.
> > > http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2006-04/msg
> > 00193.html
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> > > Rodrigo Borges Pereira
> > > Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 7:06 AM
> > > To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [Xen-users] Kernel error
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I got this on the console of one DomU:
> > >
> > > --> BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
> > >
> > > Pid: 0, comm:              swapper
> > > EIP: 0061:[<c01013a7>] CPU: 0
> > > EIP is at 0xc01013a7
> > >  EFLAGS: 00000246    Tainted: GF      (2.6.16-xen3_86.1_rhel4.1 #1)
> > > EAX: 00000000 EBX: 00000001 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00004eaf
> > > ESI: 00000000 EDI: 00000001 EBP: c03e4000 DS: 007b ES: 007b
> > > CR0: 8005003b CR2: 8005230c CR3: 004ec000 CR4: 00000640
> > > [<c0102b53>] xen_idle+0x53/0xb0  [<c0102c1f>]
> > > cpu_idle+0x6f/0xe0  [<c03e69da>] start_kernel+0x1da/0x230
> > > [<c03e6320>] unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x1f0
> > >
> > >
> > > It didn't seem to affect the operation of either DomU or Dom0.
> > >
> > > Should i worry?
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > r
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Xen-users mailing list
> > > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-users mailing list
> > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> 
> --
> Stephen G. Traugott  (KG6HDQ)
> UNIX/Linux Infrastructure Architect, TerraLuna LLC
> stevegt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.stevegt.com -- http://Infrastructures.Org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>