WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Kernel panic with kernel 2.6.16-xen3_86.1 in a Dell PE 1

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Kernel panic with kernel 2.6.16-xen3_86.1 in a Dell PE 1850
From: Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu <m3freak@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:34:38 -0400
Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:38:20 -0700
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Subject:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=FuMKfw9erw23KaBhaTxVV3AXdvsFDirxuwJloR3qVE3mno9eC/6PVRJsk5s7UTuUu7qUl9rdzrLr3YuNuqcpPoAHtyQhvMwaf5xWuNi4zj5+PwP6YALi4amvxupULh6j7rbjTDmEjqgZoej23xijFDZCulSAtF3x3b3zouHokC0= ;
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <yauwta0rtux.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <yau8xmg8oq3.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxx> <yauwta0rtux.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 2006-26-07 at 17:31 -0300, Gustavo Chaves wrote:
>   > Perhaps I should try to use the RHEL4 source package and apply the
>   > xen patch to it...
> 
> I want to try this, but since the RHEL4 default kernel is 2.6.9 and
> the one I build for xen is 2.6.16 I'm not sure if I should just use
> the /boot/config-2.6.9-5.ELsmp before building the 2.6.16 kernel
> again... I guess there may be too many different options... Has
> anybody tried this before?

I've tried that, and it worked (some small errors), but it wasn't a
straight drop in.  I had to compare the .configs for the RHEL 4 kernel
to the xen kernel, and add some missing options to the RHEL 4 kernel.  I
eventually got rid of this and went back to the xen default kernels.

Regards,

Ranbir

-- 
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.17-1.2141_FC4 i686 GNU/Linux 
10:31:54 up 4:01, 2 users, load average: 0.57, 0.26, 0.22 



_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>