| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] compiling oprofile in FC5 for setting up xenoprof
Ray Bryant wrote:
On Friday 14 July 2006 17:13, Ranganathan, Shobha wrote:
I am trying to compile oprofile 0.9.1 after applying patches
xenoprof-2.0-oprofile-0.9.1.patch in FC5.
After I run ./configure, I did a make
I get the error . Has some one seen this before ?
The attached patch is what I am using to get around this.
Someone with real C++/Oprofile knowledge should probably supply a fix.
make[2]: Entering directory `/root/oprofile-0.9.1/libpp'
if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I ../libop -I ../libutil -I
../libdb -I ../libopt++ -I ../libutil++ -I ../libop++ -I ../libregex -W
-Wall -fno-common -ftemplate-depth-50 -g -O2 -MT arrange_profiles.o -MD
-MP -MF ".deps/arrange_profiles.Tpo" -c -o arrange_profiles.o
arrange_profiles.cpp; \
then mv -f ".deps/arrange_profiles.Tpo" ".deps/arrange_profiles.Po";
else rm -f ".deps/arrange_profiles.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
arrange_profiles.cpp:93: error: definition of 'bool
profile_classes::matches(const profile_classes&)' is not in namespace
enclosing 'profile_classes'
make[2]: *** [arrange_profiles.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/oprofile-0.9.1/libpp'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/oprofile-0.9.1'
make: *** [all] Error 2
I have already built xen0 and xenU kernels. I am trying to get xenoprof
to run...
Regards
Shobha Ranganathan
"The significant challenges we face cannot be resolved at the same level
of thinking we were at when we created them." Albert Einstein
The OProfile cvs has a similar change checked in 2005-12-05. However,
it keeps as many methods in anon namespace as possible. This patch is
currently in the srpms for FC5/6 oprofile, as oprofile-0.9.1-anon.patch.
-Will
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home