|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with t
Hello Keir,
today I got this error:
[ 1146.202386] irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
[ 1146.205607]
[ 1146.205608] Call Trace: <IRQ> <ffffffff801590a5>{__report_bad_irq+53}
[ 1146.208938] <ffffffff80159333>{note_interrupt+563} <ffffffff80158a36>
__do_IRQ+214}
[ 1146.214881] <ffffffff8010d0d7>{do_IRQ+71} <ffffffff80311b76>{evtchn_d
_upcall+166}
[ 1146.220863] <ffffffff8010b6d2>{do_hypervisor_callback+30} <EOI>
[ 1146.224036] <ffffffff801073aa>{hypercall_page+938} <ffffffff801073aa>
hypercall_page+938}
[ 1146.229934] <ffffffff8010e987>{safe_halt+119} <ffffffff801097d7>{xen_
dle+119}
[ 1146.235920] <ffffffff801098a0>{cpu_idle+176} <ffffffff8058f7ca>{start
kernel+506}
[ 1146.241780] <ffffffff8058f102>{_sinittext+258}
[ 1146.247580] handlers:
[ 1146.250393] [<ffffffff88039370>] (ata_interrupt+0x0/0x1b0 [libata])
[ 1146.253445] Disabling IRQ #17
I am using xen unstable 20060610 with a 2.6.16.20 kernel.
I thought, that you made a fix for interrupt sharing between dom0 and domUs.
So what went wrong?
Thanks in advance,
Johnny
Am Montag, 5. Juni 2006 20:15 schrieb Keir Fraser:
>
> On 5 Jun 2006, at 19:07, Hans-Christian Armingeon wrote:
>
> > What can I do to debug the problem with the irq?
>
> Like I said, the issue is known. It can occur whenever an irq is shared
> by more than one driver domain (including domain 0). A patch will be
> forthcoming but for now noirqdebug is a perfect workaround.
>
> -- Keir
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option), (continued)
- Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option), Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option), Itai Tavor
- Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option), Hans-Christian Armingeon
- Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option), Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option), Hans-Christian Armingeon
- Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option), Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option), Hans-Christian Armingeon
- Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option), Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option), Hans-Christian Armingeon
- Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option), Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option),
Hans-Christian Armingeon <=
- Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option), Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option), Hans-Christian Armingeon
- Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option), Keir Fraser
|
|
|
|
|