xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

[Xen-users] DHCP on second physical adapter

from [Gawain Lynch]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	[Xen-users] DHCP on second physical adapter
From:	Gawain Lynch <gawain.lynch@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sun, 04 Jun 2006 02:08:23 +1000
Delivery-date:	Sat, 03 Jun 2006 09:08:46 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I am trying to do something rather similar to what is described in
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2006-02/msg00602.html
and I'm hitting a brick wall with one of the interfaces.

In dom0 I have:
  eth0 - LAN (static)
  eth1 - Internet (DHCP)

I am trying to run a domU that takes over each of these interfaces, that
is I want dom0 to have a LAN address, but not be accessible from the
network on eth1 (Internet).

All this seems to work fine when both eth0 & eth1 are static in dom0,
however when I start the domU the eth1 gets a 192.168.0.0 address and I
can not for the life of me get a single packet to route.  At the same
time eth1 in dom0 retains it valid 203.214.x.x (DHCP assigned) address.

Can someone please put me out of my misery here as I am sure I am very
close to getting this right.

Thanks,

Gawain







_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-users] DHCP on second physical adapter, Gawain Lynch <=

Previous by Date:	[Xen-users] Re: VT-ready workstation for SuSE10.1/Xen and Windows, Greg Oberfield
Next by Date:	Re: [Xen-users] cpu allocation per virtual machine!, Yura Pismerov
Previous by Thread:	[Xen-users] irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option), Hans-Christian Armingeon
Next by Thread:	Re: [Xen-users] xen 3.0.2 with nvidia, Yuan, Jue
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]