|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-users
RE: [Xen-users] Re: Re: Redundant server setup
 
> > > 7-disk RAID5
> >
[...]
> 
> This config is actually fairly typical in the SAN world.
I know. But it's usually running FC or SCSI disks with a latency twice as low 
as SATA, 2 GB of battery backed cache memory and really good RAID 5 processors. 
Even with this, performance for write ops is not very good.
BR,
--
Sylvain COUTANT
ADVISEO
http://www.adviseo.fr/
http://www.open-sp.fr/
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- Re: [Xen-users] Re: Re: Redundant server setup, (continued)
 
- Re: [Xen-users] Re: Re: Redundant server setup, Christopher G. Stach II
 - Re: [Xen-users] Re: Re: Redundant server setup, Paul M.
 - Re: [Xen-users] Re: Re: Redundant server setup, Christopher G. Stach II
 
- Re: [Xen-users] Re: Re: Redundant server setup, Javier Guerra
 - Re: [Xen-users] Re: Re: Redundant server setup, Miles Fidelman
 - Re: [Xen-users] Re: Re: Redundant server setup, John Madden
 
- RE: [Xen-users] Re: Re: Redundant server setup, Sylvain Coutant
 - RE: [Xen-users] Re: Re: Redundant server setup, John Madden
 - RE: [Xen-users] Re: Re: Redundant server setup,
Sylvain Coutant <=
 
- Re: [Xen-users] Re: Re: Redundant server setup, Javier Guerra
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |