| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Re: Anyone got Enomalism installed?
I saw your post. I think you're right. I gave up on enomalism and
just whipped up a perl script to automate the creation and removal of
domU's (not pretty but it works). Perhaps I can daemonize it, make it
stick to a port on the dom0, create a cgi on another server, and
create a web interface for it.
S
On May 22, 2006, at 11:04 PM, Itai Tavor wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 04:24:58PM -0700, Stephen Yum wrote:
Has anyone got enomalism (www.enomalism.com) installed?
Documentation is sparse, but it seems like it has to be installed on
dom0, is that correct?
If that's the case, one of the dependencies is the fedora directory
server, which requires at least 256MB of RAM. My dom0 and would
rather not allocate any more. Is there a way to get this to run
under
64MB or at least get it to run in a domU?
You should be able to run FDS on a domU -- I really can't see any
reason why
they'd require it to be on the same machine as the management webapp.
The wisdom of having a hard requirement of a large, complex,
hard-to-install, and unfamiliar-to-most-people for your basic VM
management
app is another matter entirely.
- Matt
Yeah, what he said.
Enomalism looks great as a UI for managing Xen, but its back-end
design can be summed up with a "Huh?".
Now, enomalism with simple authentication and file-based storage of
domain configuration... that would be useful. I just posted a
question about that to the enomalism "mailing list".
Just keep swimming.
Itai
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home