| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
RE: [Xen-users] Basic Xen Question
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julius Spencer [mailto:julius@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 16 May 2006 21:23
> To: Petersson, Mats
> Cc: Sylvain Coutant; xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Basic Xen Question
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the reply!
>
> Essentially I have a binary driver. There are only a few
> OS's which it works under. Unfortunately IBM say that they
> don't have much 'swing' in getting their suppliers to open
> source the driver and Adaptec seem to have made it impossible
> to make contact with them unless you have bought
> from them directly.
>
> If I could patch the kernel which comes with the distro so it
> was "xenified" ( :) ) then perhaps I could continue to use
> the same driver.
>
> In this case, as it is a RAID type of device I'll have to opt
> to use software RAID.
>
> Thank you again for the reply.
Unfortunately in this type of situation, I'm not sure you'd get much
help by using an older kernel - the driver may well not behave itself
well enough to still work under Xen... At least, I think that is still a
problem in Xenified Linux as it is under HVM - drivers in Xenified Linux
are modified to "understand" Xen, and that's not going to work with
binary drivers. However, I may be wrong. Someone with better
understanding of this may be able to correct me (or say I'm right).
--
Mats
>
> Petersson, Mats wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Sylvain Coutant [mailto:sco@xxxxxxxxxx]
> >> Sent: 16 May 2006 12:02
> >> To: Petersson, Mats; 'Julius Spencer';
> xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Basic Xen Question
> >>
> >>>> Does anyone know if it is possible to patch an older kernel (eg.
> >>>> 2.6.9) so it can be compiled to run as a Xen kernel (dom0)?
> >>> Now, my question is: Why would you want that?
> >> ie, just because one have some other patches to apply against the
> >> kernel. It can sometimes be a true nightmare to set up a full
> >> dom0+domU which includes every tool one need :-(
> >
> > Ok, fair enough. You'd just have to look at which patches are the
> > biggest - and I think Xen is quite intrusive, so unless your other
> > patches are also touching a lot of files in the kernel, I would
> > suspect that porting the other patches would be easier...
> >
> > --
> > Mats
> >> --
> >> Sylvain
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-users mailing list
> > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home