|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
[Xen-users] Xen Performance with Charm++
Dear All,
I am doing a performance study on Xen, and we are deploying Charm++
parallel runtime library as part of our applications. However, we
observed a 20% slow down in Xen kernel that was not observed with MPICH.
It is very important for us to understand why this overhead is happening.
I am guessing that is caused due to the higher cost of system calls like
fork and exec, since Charm++ deploy a dynamic load-balancing algorithm
that relocates jobs across the cluster, and thus using extensively the
fork and exec syscalls. However, it is surprising for me that the
overhead is as high as 20%.
My question is about the cost of fork and exec in the new Xen v3? My
guess is that they are higher than those published for v1 in Xen Art of
virtualization paper.
Thank you,
Lamia Youseff
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-users] Xen Performance with Charm++,
Lamia M.Youseff <=
|
|
|
|
|