Re: [Xen-users] network-route and vif-route setup help

Here is the output of my domU:
-bash-3.00# ifconfig
eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:16:3E:7D:2B:63
          inet addr:82.165.37.144  Bcast:82.165.37.144  Mask:255.255.255.255
          inet6 addr: fe80::216:3eff:fe7d:2b63/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:14 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
          RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:756 (756.0 b)

lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
          inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
          inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
          UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
          RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
          RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)

-bash-3.00# ip r
169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0  scope link

as you can see the route isn't correct i don't think. and i can't add my own 
route:
-bash-3.00# ip route replace default via 82.165.27.12
RTNETLINK answers: Network is unreachable
-bash-3.00# ip route replace default via 10.255.255.1
RTNETLINK answers: Network is unreachable


I have edited the network-route file:
[root@cyclops ~]# cat /etc/xen/scripts/network-route
#!/bin/sh
#============================================================================
# Default Xen network start/stop script.
# Xend calls a network script when it starts.
# The script name to use is defined in /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp
# in the network-script field.
#
# Usage:
#
# network-route (start|stop|status) {VAR=VAL}*
#
# Vars:
#
# netdev     The gateway interface (default eth0).
# antispoof  Whether to use iptables to prevent spoofing (default yes).
#
#============================================================================

echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth0/proxy_arp

I am out of ideas.

On Wed, March 29, 2006 10:43 am, Ralf Steenbock wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>> So what i see is this, ifconfig says:
>> [root@cyclops ~]# ifconfig
>> eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:40:CA:80:5B:80 inet 
>> addr:82.165.27.12
>> Bcast:82.165.27.12  Mask:255.255.255.255
>> inet6 addr: fe80::240:caff:fe80:5b80/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST MULTICAST  
>> MTU:1500
>> Metric:1
>> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>> RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
>> Interrupt:23 Base address:0xe000
>>
>>
>> lo        Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0 
>> inet6 addr:
>> ::1/128 Scope:Host
>> UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
>> RX packets:48 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>> TX packets:48 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>> RX bytes:4360 (4.2 KiB)  TX bytes:4360 (4.2 KiB)
>>
>>
>> vif1.0    Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF inet 
>> addr:82.165.27.12
>> Bcast:82.165.27.12  Mask:255.255.255.255
>> inet6 addr: fe80::fcff:ffff:feff:ffff/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING 
>> MULTICAST
>> MTU:1500  Metric:1
>> RX packets:10 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:5 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>> RX bytes:588 (588.0 b)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
>>
>>
>>
>> 82.165.27.12 is my main IP. vif1.0 seems to have been assigned the same ip.
>> which probably makes sense because of what ip r says: [root@cyclops ~]# ip r
>> 82.165.37.144 dev vif1.0  scope link  src 82.165.27.12
>> 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0  scope link
>> default via 10.255.255.1 dev eth0
>>
>> 37.144 is my domU ip. not sure exactly whats going on. but it probably means 
>> vif1.0
>> is connected on 144? no idea.
>>
>> and what i have in my domU config: vif = [ 'ip=82.165.37.144' ] ip = 
>> "82.165.37.144"
>> netmask="255.255.255.255" gateway="10.255.255.1" #gateway="82.165.27.12"
>>
>>
>> the question is here do i use my isp's gateway? (10.*) the one for dom0? OR 
>> do i use
>> dom0 itself? since we are routing i should use dom0? I tried both. the 
>> ifconfig and ip
>> r output is the same.
>>
>> and lastly i used centos for domU too. so my
>> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 is:
>> DEVICE=eth0
>> ONBOOT=yes
>> BOOTPROTO=static
>> IPADDR=82.165.37.144
>> NETMASK=255.255.255.255
>> GATEWAY=10.255.255.1
>>
>>
>> Is everything correct here?
>>
>>
> This looks quite similar to my config. This way your domu mac should not
> be visible to the switch. Did you put
>
>
> echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward echo 1 > 
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth0/proxy_arp
>
> into /etc/xen/scripts/network-route ?
>
> It is absolutely necessary, because otherwise the server will not
> forward packets to domu (first line) and not answer to arp request for the ip 
> of domu
> (second line).
> Try it again and play with your network settings in domu ("xm console
> xxx" with xxx as id of your domu). What is the output of "ifconfig" and "ip 
> r" in domu?
>
>
> --
> Dipl.-Ing. Ralf Steenbock -- EDV-Systementwicklung
> Weg am Kötterberg 39, D-44807 Bochum
> Tel.:  +49 (0)234 3252043 / +49 (0)177 7550868
> www:   <http://www.openlogic.de>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
>
>


-- 
Website: http://www.mooktakim.com
email: mma@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] network-route and vif-route setup help
