 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] xen and boot problems (with CentOS 4.2)
| To: | "mbjohn@xxxxxxxx" <mbjohn@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-users] xen and boot problems (with CentOS 4.2) |
| From: | "Eric Peterson" <srcfoo@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:57:38 -0600 |
| Cc: | Haavard Bjerke <havard.bjerke@xxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 29 Mar 2006 15:59:24 +0000 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FE8A2843UCVvzdqoLPZJHIlvU0ivH25LdbXmZ+HGstGTLbcKgSO5EK/dcPNNRUGSCk26TovFZo4eCQTPhAh6b4SzWpmK34LgmMaIUj27aLfCPhkgi6brxSu27h9XbXuFtxDQhzC1NFx0Afw4UZQBZeKs2jOoipnMJJ3lkKKLCPc= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.GSO.4.58.0603291026070.1011@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <Pine.GSO.4.58.0603291014540.1011@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <442AA694.20809@xxxxxxx> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0603291026070.1011@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On 3/29/06, mbjohn@xxxxxxxx <mbjohn@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thank you so much for the quick reply! The fastboot option did the > trick and I'm now in my virtual machine! > > Should I be concerned about having to use the fastboot option? Will it > cause problems later on? > > Thanks again! > > Brian fastboot won't cause problems by itself. It disables fsck checking on boot. fsck is complaining in this case because it thinks the partition is mounted. The way that you would find problems later on is when the system was shutdown uncleanly and no disk check was forced on the filesystem. This shouldn't be a problem with you domU systems since you should know when things have been shutdown uncleanly and you should be able to run fsck manually on the partition from dom0 before it's next boot. I wonder why fsck is confused? How are you passing the block device on to the domU? It isn't mounted in dom0 is it? Is it a file or partition? Sorry for all the questions but I'm curious. Cheers! Eric _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] xen and boot problems (with CentOS 4.2), mbjohn |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] xen and boot problems (with CentOS 4.2), mbjohn |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] xen and boot problems (with CentOS 4.2), mbjohn |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] xen and boot problems (with CentOS 4.2), mbjohn |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
