WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

OT: GPL, Was: [Xen-users] Domain context switch time

To: Randy Thelen <rthelen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: OT: GPL, Was: [Xen-users] Domain context switch time
From: Wayde Nie <xen@xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:21:23 -0500
Cc: "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:26:05 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.3
Quoting Randy Thelen <rthelen@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> Because
> Xen is open source, it is certainly the case that you or someone
> could add such support into the Xen source code.  And, because of the
> GPL you (or they) would be required to make their source available
> (i.e., it's illegal to benefit privately) even if the modification
> were not accepted into the Xen source tree.

OT, but this isn't true...

There is no requirement to distribute your changes to GPL'd software to
anyone... However, If you choose to distribute a derived work, you must include
(or make available) the new source to the people you distribute the derived
work to, under the GPL.

You can even charge for the changes and agree to only distribute your changes to
certain clients (ie. contract consultant), but the people who you sold the
changes to would be entitled to the source for those changes and be as free to
redistribute (or not) as you were.

See:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#TOCGPLRequireSourcePostedPublic

Of course, generally the benefit of OSS is that changes tend to be recontributed
back into the public project... This is encouraged by the GPL in the sense that
anyone who receives a generally useful change is free to redistribute it back
to the public no matter how they received it (for fee/for free).

--
Wayde.


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>